Reply to letter to the editor: Pros and cons of a novel coronary stenting technique for medina 0.0.1 lesions: Osdokina crush
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-8535-2336 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-3817-851X | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-6386-4346 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-9986-050X | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Acar, Emrah | |
dc.contributor.author | Güneş, Yılmaz | |
dc.contributor.author | İzgi, İbrahim Akın | |
dc.contributor.author | Kırma, Cevat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-22T10:54:51Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-22T10:54:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | en_US |
dc.department | BAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | To the Editor, We would like to express our gratitude to the authors for carefully reading and analyzing our case report.1 One of the most intriguing lesions in terms of percutaneous coronary interventions carried out in coronary bifurcation lesions is Medina 0.0.1 or isolated ostial side branch (SB) lesions.2 Percutaneous coronary interventions techniques for Medina 0.0.1 lesions are generally divided into 2 categories in the literature: those that involve stenting the ostial lesion and those that involve balloon angioplasty with atherectomy on the ostial lesion. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Acar, E., Güneş, Y., İzgi, İ. A., & Kırma, C. (2023). Reply to Letter to the Editor:“Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0. 1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush”. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 27(9), 554. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 555 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-2263 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2149-2271 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 37487230 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 554 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2023.3541 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12260 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 27 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001080315700011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q3 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Acar, Emrah | |
dc.institutionauthor | Güneş, Yılmaz | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kare Publication | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Anatolian Journal of Cardiology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Provisional T Stenting Technique | en_US |
dc.subject | Drug-Eluted Balloon (DEB | en_US |
dc.subject | Napkin Effect | en_US |
dc.title | Reply to letter to the editor: Pros and cons of a novel coronary stenting technique for medina 0.0.1 lesions: Osdokina crush | en_US |
dc.type | Letter | en_US |