Reply to letter to the editor: Pros and cons of a novel coronary stenting technique for medina 0.0.1 lesions: Osdokina crush
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2023
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Kare Publication
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
To the Editor, We would like to express our gratitude to the authors for carefully reading
and analyzing our case report.1 One of the most intriguing lesions in terms of percutaneous coronary interventions carried out in coronary bifurcation lesions is Medina 0.0.1 or isolated ostial side branch (SB) lesions.2 Percutaneous coronary interventions techniques for Medina 0.0.1 lesions are generally divided into 2 categories in the literature: those that involve stenting the ostial lesion and those that involve balloon angioplasty with atherectomy on the ostial lesion.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Provisional T Stenting Technique, Drug-Eluted Balloon (DEB, Napkin Effect
Kaynak
Anatolian Journal of Cardiology
WoS Q Değeri
Q3
Scopus Q Değeri
Q3
Cilt
27
Sayı
9
Künye
Acar, E., Güneş, Y., İzgi, İ. A., & Kırma, C. (2023). Reply to Letter to the Editor:“Pros and Cons of a Novel Coronary Stenting Technique for Medina 0.0. 1 Lesions: Osdokina Crush”. Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, 27(9), 554.
