Is only perianal anesthesia with lidocaine-prilocaine cream sufficient to decrease the pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy? A prospective randomized study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8688-4772en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0580-2144
dc.contributor.authorKandıralı, Engin
dc.contributor.authorUlukaradağ, Emre
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Bülent
dc.contributor.authorSerin, Erdinç
dc.contributor.authorSemerciöz, Atilla
dc.contributor.authorMetin, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:26:37Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:26:37Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAims: To determine the optimal place to apply the local anesthetic agent and to investigate the efficacy of lidocaine-prilocaine cream on the perianal and intrarectal region during prostate biopsy. Methods: The study included 80 patients. Patients were randomized into four groups: group 1 served as the control group and was administered no anesthesia; group 2 received 5 ml lidocaine-prilocaine cream perianally; group 3 received 5 ml lidocaine-prilocaine cream intrarectally, and group 4 received lidocaine-prilocaine cream perianally and intrarectally. Pain scores during probe insertion, biopsy procedure, and the overall pain score were assessed. Mean pain scores in each group were compared statistically. Results: In group 1, the mean pain score was significantly higher during probe insertion than that during biopsy (p < 0.001). For the mean overall pain scores, there was no significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.942), but the results of group 1 were statistically different from groups 2 (p = 0.001) and 4 (p < 0.001). When we compared the biopsy pain scores, there was no significant difference among the groups (p > 0.05). During probe insertion, subjects in groups 2 and 4 reported significantly lower pain scores than the control group (p = 0.002, p = 0.001, respectively). Conclusions: Perianal anesthesia with lidocaine-prilocaine cream may solely be sufficient to decrease the pain during prostate biopsy. Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000209354
dc.identifier.endpage265en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19440010en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-65949085150en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage262en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000209354
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/6605
dc.identifier.volume82en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000266219700003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorKandıralı, Engin
dc.institutionauthorUlukaradağ, Emre
dc.institutionauthorUysal, Bülent
dc.institutionauthorSerin, Erdinç
dc.institutionauthorSemerciöz, Atilla
dc.institutionauthorMetin, Ahmet
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrologia Internationalisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectProstateen_US
dc.subjectBiopsyen_US
dc.subjectTransrectal Ultrasounden_US
dc.subjectPainen_US
dc.titleIs only perianal anesthesia with lidocaine-prilocaine cream sufficient to decrease the pain during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy? A prospective randomized studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu