The left distal transradial access site could give a safe alternate site for transradial coronary intervention (The Litaunent Study)

dc.authorid0000-0001-8535-2336en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4021-3444en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6913-9073en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6724-1445en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3817-851Xen_US
dc.contributor.authorAcar, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorİzci, Servet
dc.contributor.authorDönmez, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Mehmet Fatih
dc.contributor.authorÖzgül, Neryan
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Yılmaz
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-06T10:47:46Z
dc.date.available2023-09-06T10:47:46Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractTransradial Access (TRA) is the suggested method when performing coronary procedures. TRA has several advantages over the transfemoral approach, but also some restrictions. The present study compared the efficacy and safety of the traditional proximal transradial approach (pTRA) with a newer technique known as the distal transradial approach (dTRA) for performing a coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients (n = 700) were placed into one of two categories (dTRA or pTRA) based on a random technique. The primary endpoint was RAO at follow-up. The secondary endpoints included the time required for sheath insertion, the rate of successful sheath insertion, rate of successful completion of CAG and PCI, total procedure time, total fluoroscopy time, total radiation dose, total contrast volume used, pain perception (visual analog scale 0-10), and hemostasis duration. dTRA patients had more skin punctures, failed punctures, failed wiring, overlap of access sites, sheath insertion time, and pain evaluation scale, while the pTRA group had more hemostasis time and first-time cannulation. RAO and pseudoaneurysm (PseA) were lower in the dTRA group. In this randomized study, dTRA had lower RAO and PseA than pTRA. However, multicenter, larger-patient trials are needed to provide definitive evidence.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAcar, E., Izci, S., Donmez, I., Yilmaz, M. F., Ozgul, N., Kayabası, O., ... & Kirma, C. (2023). The L eft D i stal t ransradial a ccess site co u ld give a safe alter n ate sit e for tra n sradial coronary in t ervention (The Litaunent Study). Angiology, 00033197231183226.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/00033197231183226
dc.identifier.endpage9en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3197
dc.identifier.issn1940-1574
dc.identifier.pmid37345456en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85162860187en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00033197231183226
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/11666
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001014399300001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAcar, Emrah
dc.institutionauthorDönmez, İbrahim
dc.institutionauthorGüneş, Yılmaz
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAntiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAngiographyen_US
dc.subjectArteryen_US
dc.subjectCoronaryen_US
dc.subjectDistalen_US
dc.subjectRadial Accessen_US
dc.subjectAngiographyen_US
dc.titleThe left distal transradial access site could give a safe alternate site for transradial coronary intervention (The Litaunent Study)en_US
dc.typeOtheren_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
emrah-acar.pdf
Boyut:
617.92 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: