Comparison of two measures to determine the oral health-related quality of life in elders with periodontal disease

dc.authorid0000-0001-8126-585Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6662-3185
dc.contributor.authorGöktürk, Özge
dc.contributor.authorYarkaç, Fatma Uçan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:51:36Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:51:36Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Periodontoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) are accepted as comprehensive and widely used tools for assessing oral health-related quality of life (OHQoL). However, OHQoL assessment of elders with periodontal disease has not yet been investigated. Objective: To assess the discriminative performance of GOHAI and OHIP-14 and to compare the psychometric properties of the scales in older people with periodontal disease. Method Participants were 155 elderly patients with periodontal disease attending a university periodontal department. Periodontal measures included gingival index, plaque index, probing pocket depth, clinical attachment level, and bleeding on probing. GOHAI and OHIP-14 scales were used to assess OHQoL. In addition, participants completed a checklist of symptoms related to periodontal disease. Results: Using the additive method for scoring, 22 participants (14.2%) had a GOHAI score of 0, indicating no impact from periodontal conditions, while 2 participants (1.3%) had an OHIP-14 score of 0. Over two-thirds of participants (70.96%) reported that their self-rated oral health was poor. Conclusions: Both OHIP-14 and GOHAI detected the impacts of oral disease in the elderly with periodontal diseases. Despite differences in content and emphasis, these two scales can be considered broadly equivalent. The main difference between them is the percentage of elderly participants scoring 0; the number of participants with a score of 0 for GOHAI is higher than OHIP-14. In this respect the improvements in OHQoL of the elderly items may be more difficult to detect with GOHAI.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1922/CDH_4387Gokturk07
dc.identifier.endpage149en_US
dc.identifier.issn0265-539X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid31070876en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85067266080en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_4387Gokturk07
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10015
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000469449000011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorGöktürk, Özge
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherF D I World Dental Press Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dental Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectElderlyen_US
dc.subjectOral Health-related Quality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectPeriodontal Healthen_US
dc.titleComparison of two measures to determine the oral health-related quality of life in elders with periodontal diseaseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
ozge-gokturk.pdf
Boyut:
293.41 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text