Comparison of radiopacity of current restorative CAD/CAM blocks with digital radiography

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-2865-372Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1194-0703en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0819-4578
dc.contributor.authorAtala, Mustafa Hayati
dc.contributor.authorAtala, Nagehan
dc.contributor.authorYeğin, Elif
dc.contributor.authorBayrak, Seval
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:52:49Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:52:49Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective While the radiopacity of restorative material affects the radiographic diagnosis of the teeth, there is no data about the radiopacity of current restorative computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) materials. Therefore, the present study compared the radiopacity values of current restorative CAD/CAM blocks to facilitate the material choice within such a wide variety of materials. Materials and Methods Specimens were prepared from 13 different restorative CAD/CAM blocks to compare with enamel and dentin. The specimens placed on the occlusal phosphor plate were imaged with aluminum step wedge and tooth section. The radiopacity values were calculated using the Image J program. The radiopacity values of the specimens were converted to mmAl values with the Curve Expert 1.4 program. Results The difference between the radiopacity values of dentin and e.max CAD was not significant, however, they exhibited a significant difference from the other 14 groups (P < .05). Enamel and Obsidien, Suprinity, and Celtra Duo had greater radiopacity values with significant differences from the other 12 materials whereas the difference within these groups was not significant (P > .05). Conclusions The evaluated restorative CAD/CAM materials have significantly different radiopacity values. Among these permanent restoration blocks, the highest radiopacity value was observed in Celtra Duo, the lowest in Block HC.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jerd.12429
dc.identifier.endpage92en_US
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155
dc.identifier.issn1708-8240
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30302898en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054575319en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage88en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12429
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10211
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000458175200011en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAtala, Mustafa Hayati
dc.institutionauthorBayrak, Seval
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Esthetic And Restorative Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCAD/CAM Materialsen_US
dc.subjectDigital Radiographyen_US
dc.subjectRadiopacityen_US
dc.titleComparison of radiopacity of current restorative CAD/CAM blocks with digital radiographyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
mustafa-hayati-atala.pdf
Boyut:
419.56 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ağız Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu