Efficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusion

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-5331-2206
dc.authorid0000-0003-0607-6703
dc.authorid0000-0002-1773-9114
dc.authorid0000-0001-6478-3479
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Zeliha Uğur
dc.contributor.authorErdönmez, Demet
dc.contributor.authorAteş, Melis Oya
dc.contributor.authorÇankaya, Tülin Doğan
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T20:01:35Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T20:01:35Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the quantity of extruded bacteria following with EndoVac, EDDY, EndoActivator (EA) and standard needle irrigation (SNI). Ninety teeth with a single root and canal were included in this study. Fifteen teeth were selected as the negative control group to confirm sterilization. Seventy-five teeth were contaminated withEnterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis)for 4 weeks. Teeth were prepared and divided into five groups (n:15): EndoVac, EDDY, EA, SNI and positive control groups. The extruded bacteria were cultured for bacterial quantification. The counts of extruded bacteria were lower in the EndoVac group compared to the EDDY group (P<0.05). The counts of extrusion bacteria were not different in EA and SNI groups compared to EDDY and EndoVac groups (P > 0.05). Within the limits of this study, EndoVac was found to be more reliable irrigation systems than EDDY in terms of the bacterial extrusion.
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/aej.12648
dc.identifier.endpage458en_US
dc.identifier.issn1329-1947
dc.identifier.issn1747-4477
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35861450en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85134529667en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage458en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12648
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/14215
dc.identifier.volume49en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000828139000001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAteş, Melis Oya
dc.institutionauthorid0000-0001-6478-3479
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectBacteria
dc.subjectEndoVac
dc.subjectEndoActivator
dc.subjectNeedle Irrigation
dc.subjectIrrigation Systems
dc.subjectFive Groups
dc.titleEfficacy of different irrigation activation systems on bacterial extrusionen_US
dc.typeLetteren_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu