Evaluation of five different desensitizers: a comparative dentin permeability and SEM investigation in vitro

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-5939-8170en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-9336-2865
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Nasibe Aycan
dc.contributor.authorErtaş, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorOruçoğlu, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:49:07Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:49:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and durability of five different dentin desensitizers (Gluma Desensitizer Powergel, Bifluorid 12, Gluma Self Etch Bond, D/Sense Crystal, Nupro Sensodyne Prophylaxis Paste with Novamin) on tubule occlusion and dentin permeability reduction in vitro. Method: The quantitative changes in permeability of 100 dentin discs were measured after desensitizer treatments and following posttreatments of 6% citric acid challenge for 1 min or immersion in artificial saliva for 24 hours under hydrostatic pressure generated by a computerised fluid filtration meter. Qualitative SEM analyses were also carried out. Results: Dentin permeability decreased after desensitizer application in all groups. Nevertheless, only the difference between 'Gluma Self Etch Bond' and 'Nupro Sensodyne Prophylaxis Paste with Novamin' groups was significantly different (p<0.05). Dentin permeability increased significantly after post-treatments (p<0.05). There was no statistically difference among the citric acidsubgroups (p> 0.05). Of all the artificial saliva-subgroups, only the difference between 'D/Sense Crystal' and 'Bifluorid 12' was significantly different (p<0.05). In SEM analysis, morphological changes were detected on the dentin surface and within the tubules following desensitizer treatments and post-treatments. Conclusion: All the desensitizers significantly reduced dentin permeability by changing the morphology of the dentin surface and/or dentinal tubules. Following post-treatments, there was some reduction in the efficacy of the desensitizers which was represented by the reduction in permeability values. SEM analysis revealed some physical changes in the dentin structure which can partly give an explanation to the reduced efficacy of tested desensitizers.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2174/1874210601711010015
dc.identifier.endpage33en_US
dc.identifier.issn1874-2106
dc.identifier.pmid28484578en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85017220566en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage15en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601711010015
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9376
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000412310900003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorOruçoğlu, Hasan
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBentham Science Publ Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Dentistry Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDentin Permeabilityen_US
dc.subjectDentin Sensitivityen_US
dc.subjectScanning Electron Microscopyen_US
dc.subjectGluma Desensitizer Powergelen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of five different desensitizers: a comparative dentin permeability and SEM investigation in vitroen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
nasibe-aycan-yilmaz.pdf
Boyut:
2.01 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu