Comparison of effects of bracket types and treatment duration on periodontal health of adult patients

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-4205-861X
dc.authorid0000-0003-2261-6925
dc.authorid0000-0001-7079-7236
dc.contributor.authorUstaoğlu, Gülbahar
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Yasemin Nur
dc.contributor.authorHalıcıoğlu, Koray
dc.contributor.authorUysal, Özge
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:51:51Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Periodontoloji Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of fixed orthodontic treatments with steel-ligated conventional brackets and self-ligating brackets (SLBs) on periodontal clinical parameters. Materials and Methods: Seventy-seven patients (24 male and 53 female) aged between 18 and 30 years were enrolled in the study. Periodontal parameters including plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and bleeding on probing (BOP) index were obtained from all the bonded teeth. Results: When the effect of bracket type and duration of treatment on gingival tissues was examined, there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment times (P = 0.670) and bracket types (P = 0.596) in terms of PI. The GI was significantly different between the different treatment durations (P = 0.045); it was higher in patients with a treatment duration of 18-36 months. However, the GI did not change according to the bracket types (P = 0.270). This result was not significantly different between different treatment durations (P = 0.270). There was no significant difference between the treatment periods (P = 0.189) in terms of BOP index, and this result did not change according to the bracket types (P = 0.621). Conclusion: SLBs do not require ligatures, which may facilitate plaque accumulation. However, our results showed that SLBs were not advantageous over CBs in terms of periodontal health.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.25259/APOS-8-2019
dc.identifier.endpage98en_US
dc.identifier.issn2321-4600
dc.identifier.issn2321-1407
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85119883072en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage94en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.25259/APOS-8-2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10057
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000476463600006en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorUstaoğlu, Gülbahar
dc.institutionauthorKorkmaz, Yasemin Nur
dc.institutionauthorUysal, Özge
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Scholar Llcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApos Trends In Orthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental Plaqueen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Bracketsen_US
dc.subjectPeriodontal Indexen_US
dc.titleComparison of effects of bracket types and treatment duration on periodontal health of adult patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
gulbahar-ustaoglu.pdf
Boyut:
619.55 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Periodontoloji Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu