Transfer accuracy of four different lingual retainer transfer methods using digital orthodontic models: An in vivo comparative study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-2261-6925en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9241-8882en_US
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Yasemin Nur
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Semiha
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T12:35:18Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T12:35:18Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the transfer accuracy of four different lingual retainer (LR) transfer methods using three-dimensional digital models. Materials and Methods: Four groups of 17 patients each were created: finger transfer (FT), silicone key transfer (SKT), acrylic resin transfer (ART), and indirect bonding (IDB). At the end of orthodontic treatment, the mandibular dental casts of patients were scanned with the LR wire. Then, intraoral scanning of the mandibular arches was performed after bonding the retainer wires. Linear and angular measurements were made using software on superimposed digital models. Results: Horizontal and vertical errors among the teeth were not significantly different among the FT, SKT, and ART groups. However, in the IDB group, linear transfer errors showed significant differences among the different teeth. The tip and rotation errors in the FT group were not significantly different among the teeth. The angular errors were lower in canines than in the incisors. In all measured parameters, the SKT group showed the lowest errors, whereas the FT group had the highest transfer errors in all parameters except vertical. Conclusions: Among the transfer methods tested, SKT was determined to have the highest clinical accuracy. (Angle Orthod. 2021;91:778-785.)en_US
dc.identifier.citationKorkmaz, Y. N., & Arslan, S. (2021). Transfer accuracy of four different lingual retainer transfer methods using digital orthodontic models: An in vivo comparative study. The Angle Orthodontist, 91(6), 778-785.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2319/020921-118.1
dc.identifier.endpage785en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3219
dc.identifier.issn1945-7103
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34287650en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage778en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2319/020921-118.1
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10944
dc.identifier.volume91en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000710147900010en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorKorkmaz, Yasemin Nur
dc.institutionauthorArslan, Semiha
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherE H Angle Education Research Foundation, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngle Orthodontisten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAcrylic Resinen_US
dc.subjectIndirect Bondingen_US
dc.subjectIntraoral Scanneren_US
dc.subjectLingual Retaineren_US
dc.subjectSiliconeen_US
dc.titleTransfer accuracy of four different lingual retainer transfer methods using digital orthodontic models: An in vivo comparative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
Ä°sim:
yasemin-nur-korkmaz.pdf
Boyut:
378.59 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
Ä°ndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
Ä°sim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
Ä°ndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Ortodonti Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu