Does prebiopsy, nonsterile ultrasonography gel affect biopsy-site asepsis?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-1514-1685en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-5428-0368en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2572-0376
dc.contributor.authorGürel, Kamil
dc.contributor.authorKarabay, Oğuz
dc.contributor.authorGürel, Safiye
dc.contributor.authorHildebolt, Charles
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:25:57Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:25:57Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which the use of nonsterile gel, prior to antiseptic procedures in ultrasonography (US)-guided percutaneous biopsies, results in contamination of the biopsy site. Materials and Methods Patients referred for US-guided percutaneous biopsies were included in this study. Transmission material used for US evaluation before biopsy-site antiseptic procedures were performed was either nonsterile gel or sterile saline. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: nonsterile gel (n = 30) and sterile saline (n = 30). Before the transmission material was used and after antiseptic procedures were performed, microbial swabs of a 10-cm(2)-diameter area were obtained at the biopsy site. Swabs were also obtained from the gel, saline, and povidine-iodine. Inoculated specimen plates were incubated at 37 degrees C under aerobic conditions, and the numbers of colony-forming units recorded. Nominal logistic regression analysis was used to calculate the odds of postantisepsis bacterial growth (after antiseptic procedures were performed) based on group, gender, coincidental disease (diabetes, chronic renal failure, and malignancy), biopsy-site location (head and neck or breast and abdomen), and local factors (skin fold, skin tag, and hair). Results The following odds ratios (adjusted for the other variables) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated: (1) group (2.9 [0.8-11.1]; p = 0.10); (2) gender (1.2 [0.3-5.2]; p = 0.78); (3) coincidental disease (7.6 [0.9-166.7]; p = 0.09); (4) biopsy site location (6.2 [1.4-31.3]; p = 0.02); and (5) local factors (7.0 [1.6-36.0]; p = 0.01). No bacterial growth occurred with swabs obtained from gel, povidine-iodine, or saline. Conclusion We conclude that nonsterile gel used prior to percutaneous biopsy does not affect biopsy-site asepsis.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00270-007-9091-9
dc.identifier.endpage134en_US
dc.identifier.issn0174-1551
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17978849en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-38049113503en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9091-9
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/6342
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000252252300018en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorGürel, Kamil
dc.institutionauthorKarabay, Oğuz
dc.institutionauthorGürel, Safiye
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofCardiovascular And Interventional Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectUltrasonographyen_US
dc.subjectNeedle Biopsyen_US
dc.subjectAsepsisen_US
dc.titleDoes prebiopsy, nonsterile ultrasonography gel affect biopsy-site asepsis?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu