Sociodemographic and clinical features of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a chart review

dc.authorid0000-0001-5207-6240en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-4322-7251
dc.authorid0000-0002-3258-2899
dc.authorid0000-0003-1102-4676
dc.contributor.authorTufan, Evren
dc.contributor.authorTopal, Zehra
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Nuran
dc.contributor.authorTaşkıran, Sarper
dc.contributor.authorSavcı, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorCansız, Mehmet Akif
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:43:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:43:46Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) is a novel diagnosis listed in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5) to encompass chronic and impairing irritability in youth, and to help its differentiation from bipolar disorders. Because it is a new entity, treatment guidelines, as well as its sociodemographic and clinical features among diverse populations, are still not elucidated. Here, DMDD cases from three centers in Turkey are reported and the implications are discussed. Methods: The study was conducted at the Abant Izzet Baysal University Medical Faculty Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (Bolu), and American Hospital and Bengi Semerci Institute (Istanbul) between August 2014 and October 2014. Records of patients were reviewed and features of patients who fulfilled criteria for DMDD were recorded. Data were analyzed with SPS Version 17.0 for Windows. Descriptive analyses, (2) test, and Mann-Whitney U test were used for analyses. Diagnostic consensus was determined via Cohen's constants. p was set at 0.01. Results: Thirty-six patients (77.8 % male) fulfilled criteria for DMDD. value for consensus between clinicians was 0.68 (p=0.00). Mean age of patients was 9.0 years (S.D.=2.5) whereas the mean age of onset for DMDD symptoms was 4.9 years (S.D.=2.2). Irritability, temper tantrums, verbal rages, and physical aggression toward family members were the most common presenting complaints. Conclusions: Diagnostic consensus could not be reached for almost one fourth of cases. Most common reasons for lack of consensus were problems in clarification of moods of patients in between episodes, problems in differentiation of normality and pathology (i.e., symptoms mainly reported in one setting vs. pervasiveness), and inability to fulfill frequency criterion for tantrums.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/cap.2015.0004
dc.identifier.endpage100en_US
dc.identifier.issn1044-5463
dc.identifier.issn1557-8992
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26491995en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84961967551en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage94en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/cap.2015.0004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8850
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000372924500003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorTufan, Evren
dc.institutionauthorTopal, Zehra
dc.institutionauthorDemir, Nuran
dc.institutionauthorSavcı, Uğur
dc.institutionauthorCansız, Mehmet Akif
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Child And Adolescent Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSociodemographicen_US
dc.subjectDisruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD)
dc.subjectMental Disorders
dc.subjectBipolar Disorders
dc.titleSociodemographic and clinical features of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a chart reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
SociodemographicandClinicalFeaturesofDisruptiveMoodDysregulationDisorderAChartReview.pdf
Boyut:
193.34 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text