Comparison of lidocaine and levobupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy

dc.authorid0000-0002-0363-9307
dc.contributor.authorApuhan, Tayfun
dc.contributor.authorKoçoğlu, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorGülcü, Nebahat
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:33:50Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:33:50Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The anatomy of the nasal passages, pharynx, and larynx and evaluation of mucous membranes and laryngeal function is well observed by transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy (TFL). In this procedure, to provide good local infiltrative analgesia, medication such as anesthetics is important for the otolaryngologist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of lidocaine (L) spray, compared with levobupivacaine solution, used for local anesthetic in patients undergoing TFL for complete examination. Methods: Sixty-two subjects (39 men and 23 women; mean age, 36 +/- 7 years) were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomly classified into two groups as levobupivacaine hydroclorur (LB) and L groups. A standard flexible transnasal fiberoptic 4.2-mm-diameter laryngoscope was passed through the nasal cavity and into the aerodigestive tract. Patients were asked to evaluate the intensity of the pain they experienced during the TFL, using a visual analog scale (VAS) and Ramsay sedation scale. Results: Demographic data were similar in both groups. There was no difference in VAS and Ramsay scores between both groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings indicated that topical levobupivacaine seems to be an effective medication for anesthesia of the nasal mucosa and may be used to allow complete examinations involving TFL. (Am J Rhinol Allergy 26, e104-e106, 2012; doi: 10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757
dc.identifier.endpageE106en_US
dc.identifier.issn1945-8924
dc.identifier.issn1945-8932
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid22643937en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84862221189en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpageE104en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/7217
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.2500/ajra.2012.26.3757
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000304988800004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorApuhan, Tayfun
dc.institutionauthorKoçoğlu, Hasan
dc.institutionauthorGülcü, Nebahat
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publications Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal Of Rhinology & Allergyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectTransnasal Fiberoptic Laryngoscopyen_US
dc.titleComparison of lidocaine and levobupivacaine in transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
tayfun-apuhan.pdf
Boyut:
228.05 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text