External dacryocystorhinostomy: Double-flap anastomosis or excision of the posterior flaps?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0001-8305-6600
dc.contributor.authorSerin, Didem
dc.contributor.authorAlagöz, Gürsoy
dc.contributor.authorKarslıoğlu, Şafak
dc.contributor.authorÇelebi, Serdal
dc.contributor.authorKükner, Şahap
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:20:47Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:20:47Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To compare the results of external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), using two different patterns of flap anastomosis with creation of both sac and nasal mucosal anterior and posterior flaps: one that includes suturing of both flaps and the other that involves excision of the posterior flaps. Methods. This randomized, clinical trial included 63 consecutive patients undergoing DCR. Patients were alternately assigned to two groups on the basis of the pattern of flap anastomosis. An H-shaped incision was created in the lacrimal sac and the nasal mucosa in all patients. In group A, posterior and anterior flaps were separately approximated; in group B, only the anterior flaps were sutured after resection of both posterior flaps. Postoperative hemorrhage, epiphora, and patency of the tract were assessed on follow-up visits. Final scores and success rates of the two groups were compared by using the Mann-Whitney U and chi(2). Results: The mean length of follow-up was 10.87 +/- 4.75 months for all patients. One patient in group B was lost to follow-up. The difference between the groups in postoperative bleeding, epiphora, and patency scores was found to be statistically insignificant (p = 0.451, p=0.974, p = 0.583, respectively). The final success rates in groups A and B were 93.75% and 96.67%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in success rate between the groups (p = 0.593). Conclusions: Our study suggests that DCR with double-flap anastomosis has no advantage over DCR with only anterior flaps. Anastomosis by suturing only anterior flaps and excision of the posterior flaps is easier to perform and does not appear to adversely affect the outcome of DCR surgery.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/IOP.0b013e31802dd766
dc.identifier.endpage31en_US
dc.identifier.issn0740-9303
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid17237686en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33846458615en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage28en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e31802dd766
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/6169
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000243950800007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorSerin, Didem
dc.institutionauthorAlagöz, Gürsoy
dc.institutionauthorÇelebi, Serdal
dc.institutionauthorKükner, Şahap
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOphthalmic Plastic And Reconstructive Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectExternal dacryocystorhinostomyen_US
dc.titleExternal dacryocystorhinostomy: Double-flap anastomosis or excision of the posterior flaps?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
didem-serin.pdf
Boyut:
131.45 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu