Role of ultrasonography in detecting the localisation of the nasoenteric tube
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2017
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç: Bu çalışmada; nasoenterik tüpün (NET) postpilorik alana geçtiğinin tespitinde ultrasonografinin (USG) başarı oranını sap- tamak ve bu yöntemi tüpün lokalizasyonu için yaygın kullanılan direkt batın grafisi ile karşılaştırmayı amaçladık. Yöntemler: NET bir anestezist tarafından yerleştirildi. İki radyo- log tarafından USG ile görüntülendi. Tüm hastalarda tüpün loka- lizasyonu abdominal grafi ile doğrulandı. Bulgular: Otuz dört hastaya NET yerleştirmek için yatakbaşı kör yöntem kullanıldı. NET'lerin 11'inin USG ile postpilorik alana geçtiği USG ile tespit edildi. Bir hastada NET lokalizasyonunun ultrasonografi ile postpilorik görülemedi, fakat kontrol batın gra- fisinde postpilorik alanda olduğu tespit edildi. Yirmiiki hastada, NET'lerin kontrol batın grafilerinde midede oldukları saptandı. USG ile postpilorik görüntüleyebilme oranımız %91,6 olarak saptandı. Tüm vakalar düşünüldüğünde, USG ile katater lokali- zasyonunu doğrulama oranı %97 olarak saptandı (34 hastada 33). Sonuç: USG; nasogastrik tüp ve NET lokalizasyonu için kullanı- lan radyografiye, güvenilir, pratik bir alternatif yöntemdir.
Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the success rate of nasoenteric tube (NET) insertion into the postpyloric area using ultrasonography (USG) and compare with the commonly used method direct abdominal graphy. Methods: A single anaesthesiologist placed all the NETs. The NET was visualised by two radiologists simultaneously using USG. The localisation of the tube was confirmed using an ab- dominal graph in all patients. Results: The blind bedside method was used for NET insertion into 34 patients. Eleven of the tubes were detected passing through the postpyloric area using USG. In one case, the NET could not be visualised in the postpyloric area using USG; however, it was detected in the postpyloric area through control abdominal radi- ography. In 22 patients, NETs were detected in the stomach using control abdominal radiography. The rate of imaging post pyloric using USG was 91.6%. When all cases were considered, catheter localisation was detected accurately using USG by 97% (33 in 34 patients). Conclusion: USG is a reliable and practical alternative to radiog- raphy, which can be used to detect localisation of the nasogastric tube and NET.
Objective: In this study, we aimed to determine the success rate of nasoenteric tube (NET) insertion into the postpyloric area using ultrasonography (USG) and compare with the commonly used method direct abdominal graphy. Methods: A single anaesthesiologist placed all the NETs. The NET was visualised by two radiologists simultaneously using USG. The localisation of the tube was confirmed using an ab- dominal graph in all patients. Results: The blind bedside method was used for NET insertion into 34 patients. Eleven of the tubes were detected passing through the postpyloric area using USG. In one case, the NET could not be visualised in the postpyloric area using USG; however, it was detected in the postpyloric area through control abdominal radi- ography. In 22 patients, NETs were detected in the stomach using control abdominal radiography. The rate of imaging post pyloric using USG was 91.6%. When all cases were considered, catheter localisation was detected accurately using USG by 97% (33 in 34 patients). Conclusion: USG is a reliable and practical alternative to radiog- raphy, which can be used to detect localisation of the nasogastric tube and NET.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Nasoenterik Tüp, Ultrasonografi, Radiografi, Enteral Besleme, Aspirasyon, Nasoenteric Tube, Ultrasonography, Radiography, Enteral Feeding, Aspiration
Kaynak
Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Q3
Cilt
45
Sayı
2
