Time-Dependent Changes in Biomechanical Properties of Four Different Synthetic Materials in a Rabbit Model and the Importance in Respect to Sling Surgery

dc.authorid0000-0002-2530-7012
dc.authorid0000-0002-5830-5961
dc.contributor.authorAtmaca, Ali Fuat
dc.contributor.authorŞerefoğlu, Ege Can
dc.contributor.authorEroğlu, Muzaffer
dc.contributor.authorGürdal, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorMetin, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorKayıgil, Önder
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:26:01Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:26:01Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To examine the time-dependent biomechanical properties of four different implanted synthetic materials. Materials and Methods: 18 New Zealand rabbits were randomly categorized into three groups: group 1 to be evaluated at the 2nd week, group 2 at the 8th week, and group 3 at the 12th week. Before the implantation, baseline values were obtained. Each of the 2 x 5 cm sized materials of mersilene, prolene, ultrapro and vypro mesh were placed in the anterior abdominal fascia. The mesh materials were removed, tensile strength (N/mm(2)) and ultimate strain (%) were measured by tensinometry and surface area losses (cm(2)) were calculated. Results: Tensile strength values (mean +/- SD) were 9.2 +/- 1.5, 8.5 +/- 1.2 for mersilene, 25.2 +/- 7.3, 14.0 +/- 2.9 for prolene, 2.2 +/- 0.6, 12.5 +/- 1.4 for ultrapro and 8.1 +/- 1.6, 7.0 +/- 1.8 for vypro at baseline and the 12th week. Ultimate strain values (mean +/- SD) were 131.2 +/- 46.1, 110.4 +/- 98.6 for mersilene, 181.0 +/- 26.4, 78.5 +/- 14.4 for prolene, 91.5 +/- 8.2, 89.6 +/- 20.5 for ultrapro and 84.3 +/- 8.9, 55.0 +/- 13.2 for vypro at baseline and the 12th week. Surface areas (mean +/- SD) were 8.87 +/- 0.14, 9.38 +/- 0.17, 8.4 +/- 0.32 and 8.76 +/- 0.16 for mersilene, prolene, ultrapro and vypro at the 12th week respectively. Conclusions: Although prolene mesh demonstrated a decrease in its tensile strength it still remains the highest at the 12th week. Considering the significant time-dependent increase in its tensile strength, ultrapro mesh should be studied in humans. A final decision on the preference of ultrapro mesh in sling surgery could be reached after such studies. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Baselen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000167847
dc.identifier.endpage461en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-1138
dc.identifier.issn1423-0399
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid19077410en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-57649128470en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage456en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000167847
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/6376
dc.identifier.volume81en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000261764800017en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorEroğlu, Muzaffer
dc.institutionauthorMetin, Ahmet
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKargeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofUrologia Internationalisen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic Materialsen_US
dc.subjectUrinary Incontinenceen_US
dc.subjectSling Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.titleTime-Dependent Changes in Biomechanical Properties of Four Different Synthetic Materials in a Rabbit Model and the Importance in Respect to Sling Surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar