Effect of different irrigation activation techniques on sealer penetration: A confocal laser microscopy study

dc.authorid0000-0002-1773-9114en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-4252-9538en_US
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Zeliha Uğur
dc.contributor.authorKoşumcu, Sevim
dc.contributor.authorMeşeci, Büşra
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-11T13:50:40Z
dc.date.available2023-05-11T13:50:40Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Endodonti Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the efficiency of a new sonic powered irrigation system named EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and conventional needle irrigation (CNI) in root canal sealer penetration. Methods: A total of 45 mandibular premolars were instrumented up to size 30, 0.9 taper and randomly divided into three groups (n = 15) depending on the final irrigation activation technique: EDDY, PUI or CNI. After the final irrigation procedures, the root canals were obturated with labelled sealer mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Transverse sections at 3, 5 and 7 mm from the root apex were examined using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The maximum depth and total area and percentage of sealer penetration were measured using ImageJ analysis software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). Results: In the EDDY group, the penetration depth was higher compared to the CNI group in the apical and middle sections and compared to the PUI group in the apical section (P < 0.05). The penetration area in the EDDY group was higher compared to the CNI group in all sections and compared to the PUI group in the coronal section (P < 0.05). The percentage of penetration was higher in the EDDY group compared to the CNI group in all sections and compared to the PUI group in the coronal section (P < 0.05). Conclusion: In the present study, sealer penetration was superior in the EDDY group than the CNI group in the apical section. In the middle and coronal sections, sealer penetration was similar for the EDDY and PUI groups.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAydin, Z. U., Koşumcu, S., & Meşeci, B. (2021). Effect of different irrigation activation techniques on sealer penetration: a confocal laser microscopy study. Chin J Dent Res, 24(2), 113-118.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3290/j.cjdr.b1530507
dc.identifier.endpage118en_US
dc.identifier.issn1462-6446
dc.identifier.issn1867-5646
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34219444en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage113en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3290/j.cjdr.b1530507
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10866
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000664977500005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAydın, Zeliha Uğur
dc.institutionauthorKoşumcu, Sevim
dc.institutionauthorMeşeci, Büşra
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishingen_US
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Journal Of Dental Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEDDYen_US
dc.subjectPassive Ultrasonic Irrigationen_US
dc.subjectSealer Penetrationen_US
dc.subjectDentinal Tubule Penetrationen_US
dc.subjectSmear Layer Removalen_US
dc.subjectScanning-Electronen_US
dc.titleEffect of different irrigation activation techniques on sealer penetration: A confocal laser microscopy studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: