Effect of different contact materials on approximal caries detection by laser fluorescence and light-emitting diode devices

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-8657-7649en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9818-4853en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2421-3807
dc.authorid0000-0002-6298-2463
dc.authorid0000-0002-7002-5903
dc.contributor.authorÖzsevik, Abdul Semih
dc.contributor.authorKararslan, Emine Şirin
dc.contributor.authorAktan, Ali Murat
dc.contributor.authorBozdemir, Esin
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Fatma
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:37:36Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:37:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the influence of the adjacent tooth surface on pen type laser fluorescence (LFpen) and light-emitting diode (LED) device readings in detecting approximal caries lesions in permanent teeth. Background data: Early detection of noncavitated dental caries is important, because disease progression can be easily halted at this stage with certain applications, such as fluoride therapy, antibacterial therapy, dietary changes, or low-intensity laser irradiation. Materials and methods: A total of 87 permanent molars with 156 approximal surfaces were assessed with LED- and LF-based devices in contact with sound tooth surfaces (the control group) as well as approximal amalgam, composite, zirconia, and full ceramic restorations. All teeth were assessed once by one trained examiner. After the LF and LED assessments, the teeth were histologically evaluated using stereomicroscopy as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve were calculated according to the appropriate thresholds (T1, sound surface or enamel caries; T2, dentin caries). Results: For the LFpen device, higher sensitivity and accuracy was found when the adjacent surface was sound at the T1 threshold and no significant differences were found among accuracy at the T2 threshold. For the LED-based device, no significant differences were found among sensitivities at the T1 threshold. At the T2 threshold, specificity was higher when the adjacent tooth had a zirconia restoration. Conclusions: It was found that both devices could be used effectively for evaluating approximal surfaces with adjacent restored teeth, regardless of the different kinds of restorative materials.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/pho.2015.3930
dc.identifier.endpage497en_US
dc.identifier.issn1549-5418
dc.identifier.issn1557-8550
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26352346en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84944070389en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage492en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.3930
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8185
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000362415500002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Fatma
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhotomedicine And Laser Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApproximal Cariesen_US
dc.titleEffect of different contact materials on approximal caries detection by laser fluorescence and light-emitting diode devicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu