Development and validation of the subjective recovery assessment scale for patients with schizophrenia

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-1593-2180en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0769-1628en_US
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorErim, Rahşan
dc.contributor.authorSoygür, Haldun
dc.contributor.authorTural, Ümit
dc.contributor.authorKiras, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorGüleş, Emrah
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:50:19Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:50:19Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Studies investigating the recovery from schizophrenia revealed two concepts of recovery; one is clinical recovery, and the other is personal or subjective recovery. Both states of recovery require specific assessment tools and therapeutic approaches. While current measures of clinical recovery can be used upon consensus all over the world, measures of subjective recovery which are based on cultural and individual values are yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to develop and validate the Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale (SubRAS) for patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: The SubRAS consisting of 17-item was prepared using related literature with focus group interviews. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficients, and test-retest reliability was assessed. Exploratory factor analyses and correlations with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF), The Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale (QLS), Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and Clinical Global Impression - Severity (CGI-S) were used to examine the factor-based validity and construct validity of the SubRAS. RESULTS: The participants consisted of 127 patients with schizophrenia (n = 110) and schizoaffective disorder (n = 17), with 63.6% being male and a mean age of 41.2 years. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the scale was calculated as 0.98 while item-total score correlation coefficients were measured between 0.83 and 0.94. Test-retest reliability (r = .98) was very satisfactory. As for construct validity, a one-factor solution was obtained that could explain 83.0% of the variance. The scale showed a high correlation with the GAF (r = .82), the QLS (r = .76), PANSS (r = -.74), and CGI-S (r = -.74). CONCLUSIONS: SubRAS is a valid and reliable instrument that can be utilized for patients with schizophrenia to assess their subjective recovery states. It is a culture-sensitive self-assessment instrument and easy to use for Turkish patients with schizophrenia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/24750573.2017.1405579
dc.identifier.endpage169en_US
dc.identifier.issn2475-0573
dc.identifier.issn2475-0581
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053477406en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage163en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2017.1405579
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9757
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000428201800008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorErim, Rahşan
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofPsychiatry And Clinical Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen_US
dc.subjectSubjective Recovery Assessment Scale (SubRAS)en_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of the subjective recovery assessment scale for patients with schizophreniaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
mustafa-yildiz.pdf
Boyut:
1.01 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu