Treatment of isolated diaphyseal fractures of the radius with an intramedullary nail in adults

dc.authorid0000-0001-5055-0500
dc.authorid0000-0001-6283-6848
dc.authorid0000-0002-2768-1323
dc.authorid0000-0003-3930-0791
dc.authorid0000-0002-4495-547X
dc.authorid0000-0002-3258-2469
dc.contributor.authorSaka, Gürsel
dc.contributor.authorSağlam, Necdet
dc.contributor.authorKurtulmuş, Tuhan
dc.contributor.authorBakır, Uğur
dc.contributor.authorAvcı, Cem Coşkun
dc.contributor.authorAkpınar, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorAlsaran, Akgün
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T18:55:11Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T18:55:11Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The goal of the radius diaphysis fractures in surgical treatment is restoration of bone length, rotation correction and to secure fixation that allows early mobilization. The purpose of this study is evaluating the results of intramedullary (IM) radius nail for the treatment of isolated adult diaphyseal fractures of the radius. Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults with isolated fractures of the radius, who were treated with closed or mini open reduction with a IM radius nail between May 2008 and November 2011 and who were followed for a least 1 year. Patients with a Galeazzi fracture, a pathological fracture, or patients with nonunion after previous surgeries were excluded. All patients were allowed full range of motion without any external support. Primary outcomes were Grace and Eversmann rating, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores. Results: Twenty-three enrolled patients (mean age 34 years; 17 men) had 23 isolated radius fractures. Mean time to fracture union was 12 weeks (range 10–13 weeks) for radius fractures. No patient had nonunion, deep infections, or radioulnar synostosis. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 42 months. Grace and Eversmann ratings of 21 patients were excellent or good, and 2 patients were medium. Mean DASH score was 4.2 points (range 0–13.3). Conclusions: Our experience indicates that this new IM radius nail may be considered as an alternative to plate osteosynthesis for fractures of the radius diaphysis in adults. IM nailing of radius fractures provides reliable bony union and excellent postoperative clinical results in adults.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipConflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest regarding this paper. No authors received any outside or industry funding or grants in support of conducting or preparing this research for publication. The radius nail which is used in this work is developed by Prof. Dr. Fuat Akpinar. It is manufactured by TST Rakor Tıbbi Aletler San and Tic.Ltd. S¸ ti., Istanbul/Turkey.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00590-013-1398-4
dc.identifier.endpage1093en_US
dc.identifier.issn1633-8065
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.pmid24370896en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84933497045en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1085en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1398-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/4704
dc.identifier.volume24en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAkpınar, Fuat
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringer-Verlag Franceen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAdulten_US
dc.subjectForearm Fractureen_US
dc.subjectIntramedullary Nailingen_US
dc.subjectIsolated Diaphyseal Radius Fractureen_US
dc.subjectRadiusen_US
dc.titleTreatment of isolated diaphyseal fractures of the radius with an intramedullary nail in adultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
gursel-saka.pdf
Boyut:
829.46 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/ Full text