Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro study

dc.authorid0000-0001-8767-788Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-6429-4923
dc.contributor.authorDeğirmenci, Kübra
dc.contributor.authorSarıdağ, Serkan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:54:23Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:54:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE. The aim of this study was to investigate the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant retained restorations on to titanium specimens after different surface treatments. MATERIALS AND METHODS. One hundred twenty disc shaped specimens were used. They were divided into three groups considering the surface treatments (no treatment, sandblasting, and oxygen plasma treatment). Water contact angle of specimens were determined. The specimens were further divided into four subgroups (n=10) according to applied cement types: polycarboxylate cement (Adhesor Carbofine-AC), temporary zinc oxide free cement (Temporary Cement-ZOC), non eugenol provisional cement for implant retained prosthesis (Premier Implant Cement-PI), and non eugenol acrylic-urethane polymer based provisional cement for implant luting (Cem Implant Cement-CI). Shear bond strength values were evaluated. Two-way ANOVA test and Regression analysis were used to statistical analyze the results. RESULTS. Overall shear bond strength values of luting cements defined in sandblasting groups were considerably higher than other surfaces (P<.05). The cements can be ranked as AC > CI > PI > ZOC according to shear bond strength values for all surface treatment groups (P<.05). Water contact angles of surface treatments (control, sandblasting, and plasma treatment group) were 76.17 degrees +/- 3.99, 110.45 degrees +/- 1.41, and 73.80 degrees +/- 4.79, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that correlation between the contact angle of different surfaces and shear bond strength was not strong (P>.05). CONCLUSION. The retentive strength findings of all luting cements were higher in sandblasting and oxygen plasma groups than in control groups. Oxygen plasma treatment can improve the adhesion ability of titanium surfaces without any mechanical damage to titanium structure.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.75
dc.identifier.endpage82en_US
dc.identifier.issn2005-7806
dc.identifier.issn2005-7814
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid32377320en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084753163en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage75en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2020.12.2.75
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10524
dc.identifier.volume12en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000529831000005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorDeğirmenci, Kübra
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKorean Acad Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Advanced Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTitaniumen_US
dc.subjectPlasma Surface Modificationen_US
dc.subjectSandblastingen_US
dc.subjectContact Angleen_US
dc.subjectDental Implanten_US
dc.titleEffect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements used with implant-supported prosthesis: An in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
kubra-degirmenci.pdf
Boyut:
966.67 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text