Evaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid, Ali/0000-0003-2835-767X
dc.contributor.authorOzata, Merve Yeniceri
dc.contributor.authorFalakaloglu, Seda
dc.contributor.authorKeles, Ali
dc.contributor.authorAdiguzel, Oezkan
dc.contributor.authorGundogar, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:58:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:58:36Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground This study aimed to compare the shaping ability of different instruments, TruNatomy Glider (TRN-G), WaveOne Gold Glider (WOG-G), and ProGlider (Pro-G) using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Methods The mesial canals of 27 mandibular molars with two separate mesial canals and moderate curvature were included in this study [n = 27 mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) root canal]. According to the manufacturer's instructions, the glide path was created with TRN-G, WOG-G, and Pro-G glide path instruments (n = 9 MB and ML root canal in each group). Micro-CT scanning was performed before and after preparation. Mesiodistal (MD) and buccolingual (BL) transportation and the centering ratio were measured at three levels within the canal (3, 5 and 7 mm). A three-way robust ANOVA was used to compare the parameters. Results TRN-G showed significantly greater transportation in the MD direction than the other instruments throughout the root canal (overall root canal) (p < 0.05). The best centering ability in the BL direction was shown by the WOG-G, regardless of level within the canal and canal distinction (MB vs. ML) (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between groups according to the level within the canal and canal parameters (p > 0.05). Whether the root canal was MB or ML did not affect centering or transportation (p > 0.05). Conclusions Glide path instruments can be used to shape moderately curved canals with minimal apical transportation and better centering ability. All three tested glide path files can used safely before the shaping file.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDicle University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship [DIS.20.024]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDicle University Scientific Research Projects Coordinatorship funded this study (Project no: DIS.20.024).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12903-023-03529-3
dc.identifier.issn1472-6831
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37875946en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174806076en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03529-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/13647
dc.identifier.volume23en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001089108600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBmc Oral Healthen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectGlide pathen_US
dc.subjectShaping abilityen_US
dc.subjectTruNatomy glideren_US
dc.subjectWaveOne Gold glideren_US
dc.subjectProGlideren_US
dc.titleEvaluation of shaping ability of different glide path instruments: a micro-computed tomography studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu