The legacy of a literary man in Islamic legal theory: Sururi Chalabi's criticisms in his supercommentary on al-Talwih and his arguments
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2022
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Bursa İlahiyat Vakfı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
Al-Taftazani (d. 792/ 1390), a well-known theorist/theologian of the post-classical era of Islamic thought, not only elucidated the statements of.adr al-shari.ah in his.ashiyah (super-commentary), titled al-Talwi., which he wrote on al-Taw.i., but also introduced several criticisms against his arguments. Al-Taftazani's work, alTalwi., was received with great interest by Ottoman scholars, who then composed many.ashiyahs on it in the fifteenth century. Although the number of.ashiyahs significantly diminished, the practice of.ashiyah writing on al-Talwi. continued in the sixteenth century. Sururi Chalabi (d. 969/1562) was one of the scholars who penned a.ashiyah on al-Talwi. during this period. The literary works of Sururi Chalabi have recently been the subject of numerous academic studies, yet his legacy in Islamic sciences has not received the same interest. This article, aiming to fill this gap in the literature, scrutinizes synchronically and diachronically the place of Sururi's.ashiyah on al-Talwi. within the tradition of Ottoman.ashiyah writing on al-Talwi. and eventually demonstrates that Sururi primarily dealt with the arguments and comments of.asan Chalabi, a previous.ashiyah author who commented on al-Talwi. and criticized them in his argument-based.ashiyah thus endeavors to position himself within the tradition of.ashiyah writing of the previous century through.asan Chalabi's work.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Ottoman Law, Ashiyah, Islamic Legal Theory (U.Ul Alfiqh), al-Talwih, Sururi Chalabi
Kaynak
İlahiyat Studies-A Journal on İslamic and Religious Studies
WoS Q Değeri
N/A
Scopus Q Değeri
Q4
Cilt
13
Sayı
1
Künye
Çelik, İ. R. (2022). The Legacy of a Literary Man in Islamic Legal Theory: Surūrī Chalabī’s Criticisms in His Super-Commentary on al-Talwīḥ and His Arguments. Ilahiyat Studies, 13(1), 9-45.
