Comparison of classical methods versus BACTEC blood culture system for culture of normally sterile body fluids

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorMengeloğlu, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorTaş, Tekin
dc.contributor.authorBucak, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorKoçoğlu, Esra
dc.contributor.authorKüçükbayrak, Abdulkadir
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:42:42Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:42:42Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground - Presence of microorganisms in sterile body sites leads to life-threatening infections. For early and accurate diagnosis of those infections, cultures of the sterile fluids have to be done. These cultures can not always detect the causative agents due to insufficent number or fastidious growing of the probable microorganisms in the material. Objectives - In this study, it was aimed to compare sterile body fluid cultures which had been processed with both conventional culture methods and BACTEC automatized blood culture system retrospectively. Material and Methods - A total of 138 body fluid cultures were compared retrospectively from the laboratory records. Results - Amongst the specimens, 122 cultures were negative. Nine of the rest 16 specimens were positive with both culture methods and seven cultures were positive with BACTEC only. None of the specimens which were negative in BACTEC system revealed positive with the conventional method. BACTEC detected significantly higher number of positivity (P<0.001). No significant difference was found between the methods due to contamination (P=0.183). Conclusion - In conclusion, our study shows that inoculation of the sterile body fluid specimens into blood culture bottles and incubation of them in BACTEC system as well as culturing with conventional methods increase the detection rate of probable causative agents.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15275/rusomj.2015.0401
dc.identifier.issn2304-3415
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85018501026en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://romj.org/files/pdf/2015/romj-2015-0401.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8578
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000437112500001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorMengeloğlu, Zafer
dc.institutionauthorTaş, Tekin
dc.institutionauthorKüçükbayrak, Abdulkadir
dc.institutionauthorKoçoğlu, Esra
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScience & Innovation, Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofRussian Open Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSterile Body Fluidsen_US
dc.subjectBACTECen_US
dc.subjectBlood Culture Bottleen_US
dc.subjectCerebro Spinal Fluidsen_US
dc.titleComparison of classical methods versus BACTEC blood culture system for culture of normally sterile body fluidsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
zafer-mengeloglu.pdf
Boyut:
904.66 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/ Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu