Comparison of the Flexural Strength of Three Different Aged and Nonaged 3D-Printed Permanent Crown Resins

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorKorkmaz, Yasemin Nur
dc.contributor.authorBuyuk, S. Kutalmis
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorAbay, Feridun
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T20:01:39Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T20:01:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength properties of three different aged and nonaged 3D-printed resins built by different 3D printing systems used in dental applications. Materials and Methods: Bars (2 x 2 x 25 mm) were additively fabricated using a 3D printer and different dental crown resins (Saremco Crowntec, Senertek P-Crown V2, and Senertek P-Crown V3) per the manufacturers' recommendations. Each subgroup was divided into aged and nonaged subgroups (n = 10 bars per group). Thermocycling procedures (5 degrees to 55 degrees C; 5,000 cycles) were performed under favorable conditions for the aged subgroups from each material. Flexural strength (MPa) was measured in all samples using a universal test machine. Results: When both aged and nonaged resins are compared, significant differences were found in flexural strength measurements (P <.001). The highest flexural strength was observed in the Saremco Crowntec group, while the lowest flexural strength was observed in the Senertek P Crown V2 group. The flexural strength measurements of Saremco Crowntec and Senertek P Crown V3 displayed no significant difference between their aged and nonaged groups (P >.05), while Senertek P Crown V2 (P =.039) showed significant differences between its aged and nonaged groups. Conclusions: Saremco Crowntec showed the highest flexural strength both in aged and nonaged groups, while Senertek P Crown V2 had the lowest strength. The artificial aging process decreased flexural strength values in all 3D-printed resin groups.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/ijp.8987
dc.identifier.endpageS207en_US
dc.identifier.issn0893-2174
dc.identifier.issn1942-4426
dc.identifier.pmid38787585en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85194129365en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpageS203en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8987
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/14231
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001288399800025en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Prosthodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.titleComparison of the Flexural Strength of Three Different Aged and Nonaged 3D-Printed Permanent Crown Resinsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu