Comparison of three different sit and reach tests for measurement of hamstring flexibility in female university students

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-6513-2499en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5527-4290
dc.contributor.authorBaltacı, Gül
dc.contributor.authorÜn, Necmiye
dc.contributor.authorTunay, Volga
dc.contributor.authorBeşler, Ayşenur
dc.contributor.authorGerçeker, S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:17:40Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:17:40Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The sit and reach test is the most common flexibility test used in health related fitness test batteries. Objective: To examine and compare three different sit and reach tests as a measure of hamstring flexibility in 102 female students. Method: The traditional sit and reach test, the chair sit and reach test, the back saver sit and reach test, and passive straight leg raise were administered in three trials to all 102 students (mean (SD) age 22 (1) years) on the some day. Results: A Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was significant (p<0.01) for the traditional sit and reach test with back saver sit and reach test and flexibility of hamstrings (r = 0.45 and 0.65 for left and right legs, and 0.63 and 0.53 for left and right legs respectively). Also, the back saver sit and reach test for the left (p<0.01) and right (p<0.05) leg was significantly associated with hamstring flexibility (r = 0.37 and 0.25 for the left leg and 0.50 and 0.44 for the right leg respectively). Conclusion: The results indicate that the back saver sit and reach test produces reasonably accurate and stable measures of hamstring flexibility. Moreover, it appears that this test is a safe and acceptable alternative to the traditional and chair sit and reach tests as a measure of hamstring flexibility in young women.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59
dc.identifier.endpage61en_US
dc.identifier.issn0306-3674
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid12547745en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0037309946en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage59en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.1.59
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/5506
dc.identifier.volume37en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000180746300012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorÜn, Necmiye
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBritish Med Journal Publ Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal Of Sports Medicineen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement Of Hamstringen_US
dc.subjectFlexibility
dc.titleComparison of three different sit and reach tests for measurement of hamstring flexibility in female university studentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
gul-baltaci.pdf
Boyut:
109.66 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/ Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu