Reliability and validity of The Turkish version of cognitive Assessment interview (CAI-TR)
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-0769-1628 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-0529-9067 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0002-2575-7398 | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0003-1820-4530 | |
dc.contributor.author | Boşgelmez, Şükriye | |
dc.contributor.author | Yıldız, Mustafa | |
dc.contributor.author | Yazıcı, Esra | |
dc.contributor.author | İnan, Eda | |
dc.contributor.author | Turgut, Celaleddin | |
dc.contributor.author | Çakır, Uğur | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-23T19:37:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-23T19:37:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.department | BAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale developed to assess cognitive functioning of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. It is scored by a clinician according to patient and informant interview. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the CAI-Turkish Version (CAI-TR). Methods: The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) was translated to Turkish and back to English and the back-translated form of the scale was approved by Dr. Ventura, its original developer.The translated text was administered to five schizophrenia outpatients as a pilot study and was deemed appropriate following a joint review by the research team. Ninety clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder diagnosis were evaluated by clinicians using SCID-I (CV), PANNS, and Social Functioning Scale. To assess the patients' neurocognitive status, certified expert psychologists administered a neurocognitive test battery including Oktem Verbal Memory Process Test, Wechsler Memory Scale-Digit Span, Verbal Fluency Test, Continuous Performance Test, Trail Making Test-A, Tower of London Test, The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes"test (Eyes Test), and Facial Emotion Identification and Discrimination Test. Results: Internal consistency of CAI-TR was good, with Cronbach's alpha value of 0.97. For patient scores, Cronbach's alpha value was 0.91. Each item of CAI-TR was correlated with the related neurocognitive test (r=0.242-0.564; p<0.05). Moreover, overall scores of CAI-TR showed statistically significant correlations with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (r=-0.538, p<0.001), social functioning (r=-0.520; p<0.01), and objective neurocognitive tests. As a measure of external validity of CAI-TR, statistically significant correlations were determined between patient, informant and interviewer evaluations independent of source of information (r=0.707, r=0.830, r=0.835, respectively; p<0.001 for all). Mean duration of patient interview was 18.7 minutes (8-30 min; SD=5.4), mean duration of informant interview was 18.0 minutes (10-25 min; SD=5.0) and total mean duration of CAI administration was 36.6 minutes (18-55 min; SD=9.7). Discussion: The analysis indicated that CAI-TR was a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate cognitive functioning. Ratings obtained from patient interview were also significant. CAI-TR is found to be a very practical and useful tool with some additional advantages such as being a clinically based interview with a brief administration time providing information about patients'functioning. | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.5455/bcp.20150502064017 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 380 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1017-7833 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-84949989210 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 365 | en_US |
dc.identifier.trdizinid | 200817 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20150502064017 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8133 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000367637600007 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | TR-Dizin | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Çakır, Uğur | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Kure Iletisim Grubu A S | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni-Bulletin Of Clinical Psychopharmacology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Cognitive Assessment | en_US |
dc.subject | Cognitive Functioning | en_US |
dc.subject | Schizophrenia | en_US |
dc.title | Reliability and validity of The Turkish version of cognitive Assessment interview (CAI-TR) | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
- İsim:
- sukriye-bosgelmez.pdf
- Boyut:
- 1.44 MB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
- Tam metin/Full text