Reliability and validity of The Turkish version of cognitive Assessment interview (CAI-TR)

dc.authorid0000-0003-0769-1628en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0529-9067en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-2575-7398en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-1820-4530
dc.contributor.authorBoşgelmez, Şükriye
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorYazıcı, Esra
dc.contributor.authorİnan, Eda
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, Celaleddin
dc.contributor.authorÇakır, Uğur
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:37:16Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:37:16Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale developed to assess cognitive functioning of patients diagnosed with schizophrenia. It is scored by a clinician according to patient and informant interview. This study aimed to determine the reliability and validity of the CAI-Turkish Version (CAI-TR). Methods: The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) was translated to Turkish and back to English and the back-translated form of the scale was approved by Dr. Ventura, its original developer.The translated text was administered to five schizophrenia outpatients as a pilot study and was deemed appropriate following a joint review by the research team. Ninety clinically stable outpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder diagnosis were evaluated by clinicians using SCID-I (CV), PANNS, and Social Functioning Scale. To assess the patients' neurocognitive status, certified expert psychologists administered a neurocognitive test battery including Oktem Verbal Memory Process Test, Wechsler Memory Scale-Digit Span, Verbal Fluency Test, Continuous Performance Test, Trail Making Test-A, Tower of London Test, The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes"test (Eyes Test), and Facial Emotion Identification and Discrimination Test. Results: Internal consistency of CAI-TR was good, with Cronbach's alpha value of 0.97. For patient scores, Cronbach's alpha value was 0.91. Each item of CAI-TR was correlated with the related neurocognitive test (r=0.242-0.564; p<0.05). Moreover, overall scores of CAI-TR showed statistically significant correlations with Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (r=-0.538, p<0.001), social functioning (r=-0.520; p<0.01), and objective neurocognitive tests. As a measure of external validity of CAI-TR, statistically significant correlations were determined between patient, informant and interviewer evaluations independent of source of information (r=0.707, r=0.830, r=0.835, respectively; p<0.001 for all). Mean duration of patient interview was 18.7 minutes (8-30 min; SD=5.4), mean duration of informant interview was 18.0 minutes (10-25 min; SD=5.0) and total mean duration of CAI administration was 36.6 minutes (18-55 min; SD=9.7). Discussion: The analysis indicated that CAI-TR was a reliable and valid instrument to evaluate cognitive functioning. Ratings obtained from patient interview were also significant. CAI-TR is found to be a very practical and useful tool with some additional advantages such as being a clinically based interview with a brief administration time providing information about patients'functioning.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/bcp.20150502064017
dc.identifier.endpage380en_US
dc.identifier.issn1017-7833
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84949989210en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage365en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid200817en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20150502064017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8133
dc.identifier.volume25en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000367637600007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.institutionauthorÇakır, Uğur
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKure Iletisim Grubu A Sen_US
dc.relation.ispartofKlinik Psikofarmakoloji Bulteni-Bulletin Of Clinical Psychopharmacologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectCognitive Functioningen_US
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of The Turkish version of cognitive Assessment interview (CAI-TR)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
sukriye-bosgelmez.pdf
Boyut:
1.44 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text