Comparison of synthetic mesh types in terms of adherence of Escherichia coli and development of mesh infections in a rat model

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-0779-0001
dc.authorid0000-0002-3410-3361
dc.authorid0000-0001-6966-9149
dc.contributor.authorBudak, Tuna B.
dc.contributor.authorYirmibeşoğlu, Ahmet Oktay
dc.contributor.authorYumuk, Zeki
dc.contributor.authorGüneş, Abdullah
dc.contributor.authorTiryaki, Çağrı
dc.contributor.authorKarğı, Ertuğrul
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:49:17Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:49:17Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare different types of synthetic mesh in terms of adherence of microorganisms and induction of inflammation, and to determine the mesh type associated with the lowest level of infection in an infected environment. Materials and methods: Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into six groups: I: Prolen Mesh (Ethicon) (polypropylene); II: HI-TEX PARP MP (polyethylene tereoxphthalate [PET]+polyether urethane (PEU)); III: Vypro 11 (Ethicon) (polypropylene+polygalactin 910); IV: Motif Mesh (Proxy Biomedical) (expanded polytetrafluoroethylene [ePTFE]; a composite mesh); V: Proceed Mesh (Ethicon) (absorbable oxidised regenerated cellulose tissue [ORC]+polypropylene+absorbable polidioxanon [PDS]); and VI: (a control group without any mesh). Sterile mesh platelets (2 x 2 cm) were implanted into rats and 1.0 x 10(5) Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) (in 1 mL) was injected via cannula lateral to each incision. Seventy-two hours later, mesh and tissue samples were obtained and investigated both microscopically and histologically. Results: In terms of tissue inflammation scores, polypropylene and Proceed meshes yielded significantly higher scores than the control group and the HI-TEX mesh. Upon microbiological evaluation, the HI-TEX and Proceed mesh groups had significantly higher numbers of E. coli than the other groups. Conclusions: Polypropylene and ePTFE performed well; the E. coli colonisation rates were low in a rat model of infection. Larger studies are warranted to explore both the short-and long-term utilities of various mesh types placed under infected conditions.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage638en_US
dc.identifier.issn0970-938X
dc.identifier.issn0976-1683
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85012024584en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage634en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9445
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000393490700025
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.alliedacademies.org/articles/comparison-of-synthetic-mesh-types-in-terms-of-adherence-of-escherichia-coli-and-development-of-mesh-infections-in-a-rat-model.html
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000393490700025en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorKarğı, Ertuğrul
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherScientific Publishers Indiaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBiomedical Research-Indiaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMeshen_US
dc.subjectInfectionen_US
dc.subjectRaten_US
dc.titleComparison of synthetic mesh types in terms of adherence of Escherichia coli and development of mesh infections in a rat modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
tuna-b-budak.pdf
Boyut:
399.04 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu