Comparison of different caries detectors for approximal caries detection

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-6298-2463en_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9818-4853
dc.authorid0000-0002-2421-3807
dc.contributor.authorBozdemir, Esin
dc.contributor.authorAktan, Ali Murat
dc.contributor.authorÖzsevik, Abdülsemih
dc.contributor.authorKararslan, Emine Şirin
dc.contributor.authorÇiftçi, Mehmet Ertuğrul
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:43:06Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:43:06Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground/purpose: Detection of approximal caries may be difficult using conventional methods including visual inspection (VI) and radiography. The purpose of this in vitro research was to evaluate the efficiency of light-emitting diode (LED) and laser fluorescence (LF) devices, and radiographic and visual examination in approximal caries diagnosis. Materials and methods: One hundred and fifty-six approximal regions were evaluated. All approximal regions were investigated using LED and LF tools after radiography and VI were performed. Histological evaluation of teeth was performed using stereomicroscopy. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and accuracy, specificity, sensitivity values calculated regarding approximal caries diagnose. Results: The specificity of the bitewing examination was higher for both T1 and T2 thresholds (0.97 and 0.99, respectively), and the LF device showed better sensitivity at each threshold compared with the other devices used for caries diagnosis (0.94 at T1 and 0.79 at T2). The receiver operating characteristic curves presented that the LF device was more successful than the other techniques at T1 threshold and VI was better than the other caries detection methods at T2 threshold. The kappa values for interobserver agreements were 0.43 (LF pen), 0.33 (LED device), 0.55 (VI), and 0.75 (bitewing examination). Conclusion: The ability of bitewing radiography to identify sound surfaces was better than that of the other methods. The LF device was the most sensitive tool for detecting approximal surfaces with caries, followed by the LED device. Copyright (C) 2016, Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jds.2016.03.005
dc.identifier.endpage298en_US
dc.identifier.issn1991-7902
dc.identifier.issn2213-8862
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30894987en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84963948242en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage293en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2016.03.005
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8692
dc.identifier.volume11en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000385786300012en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Taiwanen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Dental Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectApproximal Cariesen_US
dc.subjectBitewing Examinationen_US
dc.subjectHistological Examinationen_US
dc.subjectLaser Fluorescence Deviceen_US
dc.subjectLight-Emitting Diode Deviceen_US
dc.titleComparison of different caries detectors for approximal caries detectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
1-s2.0-S1991790216300125.pdf
Boyut:
330.93 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu