The effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction mode

dc.authorid0000-0001-9818-4853
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorAktan, Ali Murat
dc.contributor.authorÖzsevik, Abdul Semih
dc.contributor.authorÇiftçi, Mehmet Ertuğrul
dc.contributor.authorSürmelioğlu, Hatice Derya
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:48:58Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:48:58Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of artifacts produced by different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans with and without the application of an artifact-reduction (AR) option. Study Design. Ninety-eight noncavitated premolar and molar teeth were placed with approximal contacts consisting of 2 sound or carious teeth and 1 mesial-occlusal-distal restored tooth with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), amalgam, composite, ceramic-based composite (CBC), or computer-aided designecomputer-aided manufacturing (CADCAM) zirconia materials in between. The teeth were scanned with a CBCT system with and without the AR option. Images were evaluated by 2 observers. The teeth were histologically evaluated, and sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were calculated according to the appropriate threshold. Results. Specificity and sensitivity values for contact surfaces ranged from 0-48.39 and 82.93-98.40, respectively. The AR option affected (P < .05) approximal caries detection of the amalgam, composite, CAD-CAM, and CBC groups in contact surfaces and composite and RMGIC groups in noncontact surfaces. Conclusion. Artifacts produced by different restorative materials could affect approximal caries detection in CBCT scans. Use of the AR option with CBCT scans increases the accuracy of approximal caries detection. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2017;123: 392-400)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.008
dc.identifier.endpage400en_US
dc.identifier.issn2212-4403
dc.identifier.issn1528-395X
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.pmid28111155en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009774611en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage392en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2016.11.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9286
dc.identifier.volume123en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000398951300019en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Fatma
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMetal Artifact Reduction Modeen_US
dc.subjectCone-Beam Computed Tomography Scans
dc.subjectRestorative Materials
dc.subjectApproximal Caries
dc.titleThe effects of different restorative materials on the detection of approximal caries in cone-beam computed tomography scans with and without metal artifact reduction modeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
fatma-cebe.pdf
Boyut:
685.54 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text