Comparison of the resistance of teeth instrumented with different nickel-titanium systems to vertical root fracture : an in vitro study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Ersan
dc.contributor.authorAslan, M. Ali
dc.contributor.authorAkkoçan, Oğuzhan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:37:36Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:37:36Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study compared the fracture resistance of teeth instrumented with Pro Taper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland), Pro Taper Next (PIN, Dentsply Maillefer), Wave One (Dentsply Maillefer), Twisted File (SybronEndo, Orange, CA), Mtwo (MT; VDW, Munchen, Germany), and Revo-S (MicroMega, Besancon, France) nickel-titanium systems and obturated with compatible gutta-percha cones of finishing files using the single-cone technique and a resin sealer. Methods: The study included 72 mandibular premolar teeth. The roots were covered with additive silicone and placed in Eppendorf tubes, which were filled with a self-curing acrylic. The tubes were separated into 6 groups: prepared with the Pro Taper Universal (F4 40/.06) (group 1), prepared with the PTN (X4 401.06) (group 2), prepared with the Wave One reciprocating file (40/.08) (group 3), prepared with the Twisted File (40/.04) (group 4), prepared with the MT (40/.06) (group 5), and prepared with the Revo-S (AS 40/.06) (group 6). After the preparations were completed, all the teeth were filled with the appropriate gutta-percha systems. The force (N) was applied at a 1-mm/min crosshead speed until the roots fractured. Differences among the groups were analyzed by Tukey and analysis. of variance tests. Results: Group 2 was the most resistant to fracture, and group 5 was the least resistant. The difference in the fracture resistance between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = .019). The resistance of group 3 and group 6 to vertical root fracture was similar, and the resistance of group 4 was slightly lower than that of the other groups (P = .058). Conclusions: The roots instrumented with the MT were the least resistant, and the roots instrumented with the PTN were the most resistant to VRF.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.002
dc.identifier.endpage1685en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2399
dc.identifier.issn1878-3554
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.pmid26211563en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84942552842en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1682en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.06.002
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8184
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000362386100016en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAslan, M. Ali
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Endodonticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFracture Resistanceen_US
dc.subjectIn Vitro Studyen_US
dc.subjectNickel-Titanium Systemsen_US
dc.subjectVertical Root Fractureen_US
dc.titleComparison of the resistance of teeth instrumented with different nickel-titanium systems to vertical root fracture : an in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
ersan-cicek.pdf
Boyut:
400.57 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Protetik Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu