Effects of Two Different Cold Application Methods After Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid35322202300
dc.authorscopusid57205057417
dc.authorscopusid56251292400
dc.contributor.authorIlce, Arzu
dc.contributor.authorSoysal, Ganime Esra
dc.contributor.authorKoybasi Sanal, Serap
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:45:15Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:45:15Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effects of two methods of cold application on eye ecchymosis, periorbital edema, pain around the eyes and face, and patient comfort in postoperative rhinoplasty patients. Patients were randomly divided and evaluated in two groups: an ice in disposable latex gloves (IDLG) group and a cooling gel eye mask (CGEM) group. We used the CONSORT checklist to report the study. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, preoperative blood pressure, respiration, fever status, oxygen saturation, or postoperative vital signs. Patients in the IDLG group had significantly higher scores for pain around the eyes, facial pain, and periorbital edema on the first postoperative day, and significantly higher facial edema scores during the first postoperative hour (p ? .05). Patients in the CGEM group reported that they slept more comfortably (p ? .05). The results of our study showed that CGEMs reduce pain, periorbital edema, and facial edema after rhinoplasty. Copyright © 2024 International Society of Plastic and Aesthetic Nurses. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/PSN.0000000000000536
dc.identifier.endpage58en_US
dc.identifier.issn2770-3517
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38166308en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85181630324en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage53en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/PSN.0000000000000536
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12917
dc.identifier.volume44en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlastic and aesthetic nursingen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectAngioedemaen_US
dc.subjectCryotherapyen_US
dc.subjectFacial Painen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Complicationsen_US
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_US
dc.subjectRhinoplastyen_US
dc.subjectangioneurotic edemaen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectcryotherapyen_US
dc.subjectface painen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectpostoperative complicationen_US
dc.subjectproceduresen_US
dc.subjectprospective studyen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectrhinoplastyen_US
dc.titleEffects of Two Different Cold Application Methods After Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu