Evaluation of the effects of different remineralizing agents on Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesion

dc.authorid0000-0003-2379-4678en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6298-2463
dc.authorid0000-0003-1525-9608
dc.authorid0000-0001-6865-6311
dc.authorid0000-0002-6371-5420
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Emine Şirin
dc.contributor.authorAytaç, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorÇadırcı, Bilge Hilal
dc.contributor.authorAğaccıoğlu, Merve
dc.contributor.authorTaştan, Emine
dc.contributor.authorÖzkoçak, Begüm Büşra Cevval
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:49:20Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:49:20Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to compare the effects of different remineralization methods that are well established in clinical and daily use on S. mutans biofilm adhesion. In this study 72 human third molars were used. From each tooth two pieces of 4 mm x 7 mm enamel blocks were acquired. The samples were divided into 6 groups in which include 10 samples per time period (24h and 48 h) and for each remineralization method; control, flouride, ozone, CPP-ACP, arginine, novamin. After remineralization procedures, enamel surfaces were covered with saliva. 10(5) CFU/mL of active S. mutans culture were inoculated onto the samples. S. mutans colonies were counted with Plate Count Agar (PCA) decimal dilution method. Micromorphologic effects of different remineralization methods were observed by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The most S. mutans biofilm formation for both time periods was observed in the control group whereas the less biofilm adhesion was showed in the arginine group. There were no statistically significant differences among remineralization agents (p > 0.05). In the control group there was statistical difference between 24 h and 48 h (p < 0.005) but in the other study groups there were no significant difference between the time periods (p > 0.05). Remineralization agents did not significant differ on S. mutans biofilm adhesion.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2018.1499319
dc.identifier.endpage2630en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue23en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85055704954en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2617en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2018.1499319
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9466
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000456292100007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorAytaç, Fatma
dc.institutionauthorÖzkoçak, Begüm Büşra Cevval
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Adhesion Science And Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiofilm Adhesionen_US
dc.subjectS. Mutansen_US
dc.subjectFlourideen_US
dc.subjectArginineen_US
dc.subjectNovaminen_US
dc.subjectCPP-ACPen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the effects of different remineralizing agents on Streptococcus mutans biofilm adhesionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
emine-sirin-karaarslan.pdf
Boyut:
2.42 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text