Comparison of eluted monomer from different indirect and direct resin composites

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Fatma
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorBıçakçı, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:49:13Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:49:13Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractIndirect resin composites used in indirect restorations have been used as alternative methods to avoid the negative effects of a direct application. The composition and structure of these are similar to a direct composite. Several authors have discussed the elution monomer from resin composites because it is a crucial factor in optimizing the physical properties and biocompatibility of resin composites. The aim of this study was to compare the elution of monomers from different resin composites using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Indirect composites including Signum, Gradia, and Solidex, and direct composite Filtek Ultimate were used. The samples (2 x 5 mm) were prepared and polymerized for 20 seconds with a light-emitting diode unit. A secondary curing was then applied to the indirect resin composites. After fabrication, each sample was immediately immersed in a 75 wt% ethanol/water solution and analyzed by HPLC. The obtained data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD (p < 0.05). Residual monomers were eluted from indirect and direct resin composites and the amount of eluted monomers increased over time. The highest mean concentrations of residual Bis-GMA, UDMA, TEGDMA, and HEMA were detected with the Filtek Ultimate (2,342 mu M), Solidex (7,908 mu M), Signum (2.8 mu M), and Filtek Ultimate (9.7 mu M), respectively. The highest amount of eluted monomer concentrations detected was viewed as critical for toxic reactions in human cells.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2016.1274535
dc.identifier.endpage1722en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue15en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85009265653en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1711en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1274535
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9418
dc.identifier.volume31en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000400080900008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Fatma
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.institutionauthorBıçakçı, Hasan
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Adhesion Science And Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBiocompatibilityen_US
dc.subjectDirect Compositeen_US
dc.subjectHPLCen_US
dc.subjectIndirect Compositeen_US
dc.subjectUnreacted Monomeren_US
dc.titleComparison of eluted monomer from different indirect and direct resin compositesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
fatma-cebe.pdf
Boyut:
1.14 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu