Experience on subfascial mammary augmentation and influence of incisions on technique

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-2710-9615
dc.authorid0000-0001-9077-2976
dc.contributor.authorGökkaya, Ali
dc.contributor.authorGörgü, Metin
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:55:09Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:55:09Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Mammary augmentation is among the most popular types of cosmetic procedures and mammary prosthesis the most commonly accepted technique. A mammary prosthesis can be placed on transaxillary, periareolar, submammary incisions in subglandular, subpectoral, subfascial planes or in a combination of planes. Given the potential interaction between the prosthesis and the surrounding tissues, the plane in which the prosthesis is implanted has an important role among the factors affecting this interaction. The plastic surgeon decides on the incision and plane to be used by assessing the advantages and disadvantages. Materials and Methods: Prostheses were implanted in the subfascial plane in 47 patients who underwent augmentation mammaplasty. Round Moderate Plus or High Profile Cohesive II (TM) Gel implants were used. Device volumes ranged from 275 to 600 cc. Of the 47 procedures, 23 were performed over an axillary incision, 20 over an inframammary incision, and 4 over a periareolar incision. Endoscopic-assisted dissection was performed in all of the 23 cases in which transaxillary incision was used. Results: All 47 patients who underwent subfascial prosthesis implantation were followed up for a mean of 5 years (range: 2-7 years). Long-term results were satisfactory with few complications. The overall patient satisfaction rate was 89.3%, and none of the patients required an implant removal or change. None of the patients complained of severe pain, regardless of the type of incision, and resumed their daily activities on postoperative day 2. Conclusion: The subfascial augmentation technique provides good and long-term results. It requires longer operating times and is a more difficult technique compared to other planes. As the choice of incision does not largely affect the overall result, the position of the scar depends on the patient's preference, the properties of the implant, and the experience of the surgeon. The endoscopic assistance should be preferred when using the transaxillary approach.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/tjps.tjps_93_19
dc.identifier.endpage13en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-6878
dc.identifier.issn2528-8644
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage4en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.turkjplastsurg.org/temp/TurkJPlastSurg2914-244268_064706.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/10738
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000610367500002en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.institutionauthorGökkaya, Ali
dc.institutionauthorGörgü, Metin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal Of Plastic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAugmentation Mammoplastyen_US
dc.subjectEndoscopyen_US
dc.subjectSubfascialen_US
dc.subjectTransaxillary Incisionen_US
dc.titleExperience on subfascial mammary augmentation and influence of incisions on techniqueen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ali-gokkaya.pdf
Boyut:
3.34 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Koleksiyonu