Effect of caries removal techniques on bond strength to caries affected dentin on gingival wall: AFM observation of dentinal surface

dc.authorid0000-0002-6298-2463en_US
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Bora
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Emine Şirin
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:43:57Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:43:57Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of different caries removal techniques on the bond strength of two adhesive systems. Materials and Methods: Seventy human molar teeth that had proximal carious lesions were randomly divided into four groups according to the technique used to remove the caries: a conventional steel bur, an Er:YAG laser, a chemomechanical Carisolv((R)) gel, and air polishing. The groups were then divided into two subgroups according to the adhesives used: Clearfil S-3 (Kuraray Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and Adper SE Plus (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA). The enamel and superficial dentin of the crown was flattened and caries were removed using different methods. Teeth were restored with composite and three 1mm(2) stick-shaped microtensile specimens were prepared from each tooth. For each removal technique, the surface roughness of one dentin sample was analyzed using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The microtensile bond strength data were then analyzed using a two-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests, and multiple comparison tests (p=0.05). Results: The two-way ANOVA showed that the effects of the cavity preparation techniques and adhesive systems and their interaction were statistically significant (p<0.05). The TBS values were highest when bonding with Adper SE Plus to cavities prepared with the steel bur (37.20 +/- 11.65MPa) and lowest when bonding with Clearfil S-3 Bond to cavities prepared with the Er:YAG laser (16.74 +/- 6.95MPa). Conclusion: The caries removal techniques affected the bond strength values of the self-etch adhesive systems.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2015.1093339
dc.identifier.endpage170en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84946532230en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage157en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1093339
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8888
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000364193300004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Adhesion Science And Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAir Polishingen_US
dc.subjectAtomic Force Microscopeen_US
dc.subjectCaries Removalen_US
dc.subjectChemomechanical Caries Removalen_US
dc.subjectMicrotensile Bond Strengthen_US
dc.titleEffect of caries removal techniques on bond strength to caries affected dentin on gingival wall: AFM observation of dentinal surfaceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
mehmet ata-cebe.pdf
Boyut:
1.23 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text