A review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-1628-1316en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7103-0616
dc.contributor.authorKarataş, Meltem Altın
dc.contributor.authorGökkaya, Hasan
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:49:34Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:49:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Gerede Meslek Yüksekokulu, Makine Ve Metal Teknolojileri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractFiber reinforced polymer (FRP) composite materials are heterogeneous and anisotropic materials that do not exhibit plastic deformation. They have been used in a wide range of contemporary applications particularly in space and aviation, automotive, maritime and manufacturing of sports equipment. Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materials, among other fiber reinforced materials, have been increasingly replacing conventional materials with their excellent strength and low specific weight properties. Their manufacturability in varying combinations with customized strength properties, also their high fatigue, toughness and high temperature wear and oxidation resistance capabilities render these materials an excellent choice in engineering applications. In the present review study, a literature survey was conducted on the machinability properties and related approaches for CFRP and GFRP composite materials. As in the machining of all anisotropic and heterogeneous materials, failure mechanisms were also reported in the machining of CFRP and GFRP materials with both conventional and modern manufacturing methods and the results of these studies were obtained by use of variance analysis (ANOVA), artificial neural networks (ANN) model, fuzzy inference system (FIS), harmony search (HS) algorithm, genetic algorithm (GA), Taguchi's optimization technique, multi-criteria optimization, analytical modeling, stress analysis, finite elements method (FEM), data analysis, and linear regression technique. Failure mechanisms and surface quality is discussed with the help of optical and scanning electron microscopy, and profilometry. ANOVA, GA, FEM, etc. are used to analyze and generate predictive models. (c) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001
dc.identifier.endpage326en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-9147
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85044953803en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage318en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2018.02.001
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/9549
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000441009500008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorKarataş, Meltem Altın
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.ispartofDefence Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectComposite Materialsen_US
dc.subjectFiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Materialsen_US
dc.subjectCFRPen_US
dc.subjectGFRPen_US
dc.subjectMachiningen_US
dc.subjectWearen_US
dc.subjectSurface Damageen_US
dc.titleA review on machinability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) and glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite materialsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
meltem-altin-karatas.pdf
Boyut:
1.99 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Makine Ve Metal Teknolojileri Bölümü
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu