Bond strength of repaired composite resins: surface treatments, adhesive systems, and composite type

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0003-3277-197Xen_US
dc.authorid0000-0001-9818-4853en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6298-2463en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6034-3131
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Emine Şirin
dc.contributor.authorÖzsevik, Abdul Semih
dc.contributor.authorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.contributor.authorSürmelioğlu, Hatice Derya Gürsel
dc.contributor.authorTosun, Samet
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T19:43:45Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T19:43:45Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of three different surface treatments and two different adhesives on the microtensile bond strength (TBS) of repaired composites using the same or different type of resin. Twenty-four nano-hybrid (Ceram X mono-C) and 24 nanofilled (Filtek Ultimate-F) composite discs were prepared. The specimens were aged with 5000 thermocycles and randomly divided into groups according to the surface treatment methods: (a) phosphoric acid (b) Er:YAG laser and (c) aluminum trioxide particle (air abrasion). Fresh composite resins (C and F) were added to the treated surfaces with two different adhesives (two-step and one-step self-etch adhesives). Then, the specimens were aged again. The stick-shaped specimens were prepared from the discs (n=25) and the sticks were subjected to the TBS test. Results indicated that significant differences were found in TBS values among the surface treatment methods. In the C groups, the highest TBS value (41.3 +/- 8.3MPa) was recorded in the air abrasion and one-step self-etch adhesive group, which were repaired with the same kind of composite. In the F groups, the highest TBS value was observed in the air abrasion and one-step self-etch adhesive (37.6 +/- 12.3MPa) group. The treatment with air abrasion is more effective than the others, and it may be suggested for composite repair.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01694243.2015.1111187
dc.identifier.endpage533en_US
dc.identifier.issn0169-4243
dc.identifier.issn1568-5616
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84947223109en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage520en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2015.1111187
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/8844
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000366589300005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorCebe, Mehmet Ata
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal Of Adhesion Science And Technologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectComposite Repairen_US
dc.subjectAir Abrasionen_US
dc.subjectLaseren_US
dc.subjectAgingen_US
dc.subjectSurface Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectMicrotensile Bond Strengthen_US
dc.titleBond strength of repaired composite resins: surface treatments, adhesive systems, and composite typeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
Bond strength of repaired composite resins surface treatments adhesive systems and composite type.pdf
Boyut:
1.73 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Restoratif Diş Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dalı Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu