Reliability and validation of Turkish version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridGunaydin, Gurkan/0000-0003-3432-6431
dc.contributor.authorAlhomedha, Ghofran
dc.contributor.authorCitaker, Seyit
dc.contributor.authorGunaydin, Gurkan
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Furqan
dc.contributor.authorSezer, Refia
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:57:36Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:57:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Evaluation of low back pain (LBP) requires a condition specific disability questionnaire along with pain and satisfaction measure such as self-assessment pain scales. Dallas Pain Questionnaire (DPQ) is a 16-item visual analog scale, developed for evaluating patient's cognitions about the percentage that chronic pain affects four aspects of the subject's lives. It's easy to understand; can be answered in 3-5 min and can be scored in <1 min. This reliability and validation study offers health-care providers an opportunity to utilize this distinct questionnaire in Turkish population with back pain.The objectives are translation of Dallas questionnaire from English to Turkish language and to perform validation and reliability study. Methods: A total of 102 patients (79 women and 23 men) with mean age of 50.2 years and LBP for at least 3 months answered DPQ along with five other previously translated and validated questionnaires in Turkish language. Fifty-nine of these patients participated retest reliability after 7 days. Internal consistency and test-retest analyzes were conducted to determine the reliability and convergent validity was evaluated for the validation study. Results:The questionnaire was noted to have high internal consistency. The test-retest analysis revealed an excellent correlation (ICC=0.969). Pearson correlation coefficient shows that all subscales (sections) of DPQ are significant and comparable with each of the other questionnaires included in this study proving that it has sufficient convergent validity (p<0.001). Conclusion:The Turkish version of DPQ is content, valid, and reliable. DPQ is sensitive to use in patients with LBP.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/agri.2021.24861
dc.identifier.endpage22en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0012
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34988958en_US
dc.identifier.startpage16en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2021.24861
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/13489
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000791399800003en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherKare Publen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAgri-The Journal of The Turkish Society of Algologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectDallas Pain Questionnaireen_US
dc.subjectlow back painen_US
dc.subjectreliabilityen_US
dc.subjectTurkish versionen_US
dc.subjectvalidityen_US
dc.titleReliability and validation of Turkish version of the Dallas Pain Questionnaireen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu