Joint Resource Allocation for Terahertz Band Drone Communications
dc.authorid | Gurbuz, Ozgur/0000-0001-8905-3261 | |
dc.authorid | SALEEM, AMMAR/0000-0002-3885-9596 | |
dc.authorid | Erdem, Mikail/0000-0003-3501-4229 | |
dc.authorid | Saeed, Akhtar/0000-0003-4739-5065 | |
dc.contributor.author | Saeed, Akhtar | |
dc.contributor.author | Erdem, Mikail | |
dc.contributor.author | Saleem, Ammar | |
dc.contributor.author | Gurbuz, Ozgur | |
dc.contributor.author | Akkas, Mustafa Alper | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-09-25T19:57:40Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-09-25T19:57:40Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.department | Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This article proposes a joint resource allocation approach for Terahertz (THz) band (0.75-4.4 THz) drone-to-drone communications, studying spectrum and power allocation together with antenna beamwidth adjustment. Considering various drone (mis)alignment and mobility scenarios under a 3D sectored antenna model, the capacity of the proposed spectrum allocation scheme, MaxActive, is compared to existing Common Flat Band (CFB) and standard (STD) schemes, each with water-filling (WF) and equal power (EP) allocations. Results show that up to 6 orders of magnitude improvements are observed with beamwidth optimization, and MaxActive with EP performs close to CFB and STD schemes with WF in all scenarios, even under realistic beam misalignment fading instances (low and high). For drone-to-drone communications, our results prove that the THz band can provide high capacity, in the order of Tbps, which can be preserved well with beam alignment/adjustment. Evaluating also the complexity of all considered resource allocation techniques, it is concluded that MaxActive with EP allocation stands out as the most feasible scheme in terms of practical implementation with the best performance. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Trkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arascedil;timath;rma Kurumu | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | No Statement Available | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/TVT.2024.3354067 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 8294 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0018-9545 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1939-9359 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85182945332 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 8281 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3354067 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/13540 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 73 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001252619600114 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | N/A | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Ieee-Inst Electrical Electronics Engineers Inc | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Ieee Transactions on Vehicular Technology | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.snmz | YK_20240925 | en_US |
dc.subject | Drones | en_US |
dc.subject | Resource management | en_US |
dc.subject | Fading channels | en_US |
dc.subject | Three-dimensional displays | en_US |
dc.subject | Azimuth | en_US |
dc.subject | Transmitting antennas | en_US |
dc.subject | Solid modeling | en_US |
dc.subject | Beam misalignment | en_US |
dc.subject | channel selection | en_US |
dc.subject | drone-to-drone communication | en_US |
dc.subject | fading | en_US |
dc.subject | resource allocation | en_US |
dc.subject | terahertz communication | en_US |
dc.title | Joint Resource Allocation for Terahertz Band Drone Communications | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |