Subjective symptoms of RME patients treated with three different screw activation protocols: a randomised clinical trial.

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid31267475200
dc.authorscopusid23567888500
dc.authorscopusid7003795296
dc.contributor.authorHalicio?lu, Koray
dc.contributor.authorKiki, Ali
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:43:05Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:43:05Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to evaluate the subjective symptoms of patients during the active phase of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment, and further, to assess the differences between three different RME activation protocols. The clinical sample consisted of 60 patients (mean age 13.5 years) with maxillary transverse deficiency requiring expansion. The subjects were randomly divided into three groups on which different expansion protocols were performed. An evaluation of the subjective symptoms was carried out by a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The patients completed questionnaires after the first, fifth, tenth, twentieth and final activations. A Shapiro-Wilk test was applied to evaluate homogenity; a Kruskall Wallis test was performed for gender-related differences and to compare the different activation schedules. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the activations at the various time intervals. No gender-related differences were found. Ninety-eight percent of the patients reported pain during RME. There were no specific differences between groups except for the pain perceived at the twentieth activation. In all groups, pain, the sensation of pressure and its duration were highest at the fifth activation. Subjective symptoms tended to decrease after the fifth and tenth activations. Headache and dizziness were minimal. Different activation protocols did not appear to alter subjective symptoms encountered during RME. The majority of the patients undergoing RME suffered pain and pressure sensations especially after the fifth activation.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage231en_US
dc.identifier.issn0587-3908
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid23304972en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84873562883en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage225en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12418
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian orthodontic journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectAdolescenten_US
dc.subjectChilden_US
dc.subjectClinical Protocolsen_US
dc.subjectDizzinessen_US
dc.subjectFemaleen_US
dc.subjectFollow-Up Studiesen_US
dc.subjectHeadacheen_US
dc.subjectHumansen_US
dc.subjectMaleen_US
dc.subjectMalocclusionen_US
dc.subjectOrthodontic Appliance Designen_US
dc.subjectPain Measurementen_US
dc.subjectPalatal Expansion Techniqueen_US
dc.subjectPressureen_US
dc.subjectQuestionnairesen_US
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_US
dc.subjectadolescenten_US
dc.subjectarticleen_US
dc.subjectchilden_US
dc.subjectclinical protocolen_US
dc.subjectcomparative studyen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trialen_US
dc.subjectcontrolled studyen_US
dc.subjectdizzinessen_US
dc.subjectfemaleen_US
dc.subjectfollow upen_US
dc.subjectheadacheen_US
dc.subjecthumanen_US
dc.subjectinstrumentationen_US
dc.subjectmaleen_US
dc.subjectmalocclusionen_US
dc.subjectorthodonticsen_US
dc.subjectpain assessmenten_US
dc.subjectpressureen_US
dc.subjectquestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjecttimeen_US
dc.titleSubjective symptoms of RME patients treated with three different screw activation protocols: a randomised clinical trial.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu