Evaluation of residual root canal sealer removal efficacy of different irrigation activation techniques by confocal laser microscopy analysis

dc.authorid0000-0002-1773-9114en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-7532-4785en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-8864-3953en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-0607-6703en_US
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Zeliha Uğur
dc.contributor.authorAltunbaş, Demet
dc.contributor.authorAkdere, Sevim Koşumcu
dc.contributor.authorMeşeci, Büşra
dc.contributor.authorÇankaya, Tülin Doğan
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-23T13:14:23Z
dc.date.available2024-05-23T13:14:23Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The purpose of this study was to use confocal laser microscopy analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of conventional needle irrigation (CNI), EndoActivator (EA), and EDDY during endodontic retreatment. Methods: This study included 45 maxillary incisor teeth with a single root and canal. Root canals were prepared with ProTaper Universal files (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) and obturated with labeled sealer mixed with 0.1% Rhodamine B and gutta percha according to single cone techniques. Initial root canal filling material was removed using ProTaper Universal Retreatment files and F4 files. Teeth randomly were divided into 3 groups (n = 15) depending on the activation technique: CNI, EA (Dentsply, Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), and EDDY (VDW, Munich, Germany). Confocal laser microscopy was used to evaluate the penetration area, depth, and percentage of the residual sealer in the apical, middle, and coronal sections after irrigation activation. Results: In all sections, the EDDY group had a lower penetration area of residual sealer than the CNI group (P< .05). In comparison to the coronal section, the penetration percentage of the CNI and EA groups was lower in the apical section (P< .05). In the CNI group, the penetration depth was higher at the coronal section than at the apical and middle sections (P< .05), and it was higher at the coronal section than at the apical section. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, none of the activation systems tested could completely remove the residual sealer. However, the lowest residual sealer was seen after using EA and EDDY.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAydın, Z. U., Altunbaş, D., Koşumcu, S., Meşeci, B., & Doğan, T. (2023). Evaluation of Residual Root Canal Sealer Removal Efficacy of Different Irrigation Activation Techniques by Confocal Laser Microscopy Analysis. Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences, 13(2), 274-278.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.33808/clinexphealthsci.871991
dc.identifier.endpage278en_US
dc.identifier.issn2459-1459
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage274en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1190738en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.871991
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12152
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001018991100007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.institutionauthorMeşeci, Büşra
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMarmara Univ, Inst Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.ispartofClinical and Experimental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectConfocal Laser Microscopyen_US
dc.subjectEDDYen_US
dc.subjectEndoActivatoren_US
dc.subjectResidual Sealeren_US
dc.subjectCleanlinessen_US
dc.subjectPercentageen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of residual root canal sealer removal efficacy of different irrigation activation techniques by confocal laser microscopy analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
zeliha-ugur-aydin.pdf
Boyut:
500.16 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam metin/Full text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: