Doktora öğrencilerinin doktora eğitimi ve öğretim üyelerine yönelik metaforik algıları
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
2018
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu çalışmanın amacı, doktora öğrencilerinin ‘doktora ‘eğitimi’ ve ‘öğretim üyelerine’ yönelik algılarını metaforlar aracılığı ile belirlemektir. Çalışma grubu farklı üniversite ve bölümlerde doktora eğitimine aktif olarak devam eden 63 doktora öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu amaçlı örnekleme yöntemlerinden ölçüt örnekleme yöntemi ile seçilmiştir. Araştırma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan olgubilim deseninde kurgulanmış; elde edilen veri içerik analizi yöntemi ile analiz edilmiştir. Veri toplama aracı olarak, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen yarı yapılandırılmış bir metafor formu kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analiz sonucunda, katılımcıların doktora eğitimine yönelik 52 farklı toplam 56 metafor ürettikleri görülmüştür. Bu metaforlar gerekçelerin niteliklerine göre kategorilere ayrıldığında; 29 metaforun olumlu; 25 metaforun olumsuz ve 2 metaforun ise yansız algıları yansıttığı görülmektedir. Öğretim üyelerine yönelik 43 farklı toplam 58 metafor ortaya konmuştur. Bu metaforlar gerekçelerin niteliklerine göre kategorilere ayrıldığında; 38 metaforun olumlu algıları, 12 metaforun olumsuz algıları, 1 metaforun yansız algıları yansıttığı; 7 metaforun ise iki yönlü olduğu değerlendirilmiştir.
The aim of this study is to determine Phd students’ perceptions on ‘doctorate education’ and ‘instructors’ by means of metaphors. The study group consists of 63 students actively attending their doctorate education at various departments of some universities in Turkey. This group was chosen using criterion sampling method which is one of the purposive sampling methods. The current study was designed as a phenomenological study one of qualitative research methods. The data was analyzed through content analysis. To collect the data a semi structured form which was developed by the researchers was utilized. The results showed that participants totally produced 56 metaphors and 52 of them were different. When the metaphors were grouped based on the reasons put forward; 29 of the metaphors reflected positive perceptions, 25 of them reflected negative perceptions and two of them reflected neutral perceptions. Participants produced 58 metaphors for instructors and 43 of them were different. When these metaphors were grouped based on the reasons put forward, 38 of them reflected positive perceptions, 12 of them negative perceptions and one of them neutral perceptions. As for 7 metaphors, they reflected positive and negative perceptions simultaneously.
The aim of this study is to determine Phd students’ perceptions on ‘doctorate education’ and ‘instructors’ by means of metaphors. The study group consists of 63 students actively attending their doctorate education at various departments of some universities in Turkey. This group was chosen using criterion sampling method which is one of the purposive sampling methods. The current study was designed as a phenomenological study one of qualitative research methods. The data was analyzed through content analysis. To collect the data a semi structured form which was developed by the researchers was utilized. The results showed that participants totally produced 56 metaphors and 52 of them were different. When the metaphors were grouped based on the reasons put forward; 29 of the metaphors reflected positive perceptions, 25 of them reflected negative perceptions and two of them reflected neutral perceptions. Participants produced 58 metaphors for instructors and 43 of them were different. When these metaphors were grouped based on the reasons put forward, 38 of them reflected positive perceptions, 12 of them negative perceptions and one of them neutral perceptions. As for 7 metaphors, they reflected positive and negative perceptions simultaneously.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Doktora, Öğretim Üyesi, Metafor, Algı, Doctorate, Instructor, Metaphor, Perception
Kaynak
Sakarya University Journal of Education
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
8
Sayı
1
