Outcome of primary percutaneous intervention in patients with infarct-related coronary artery ectasia

dc.authorscopusid8650271300
dc.authorscopusid35069277300
dc.authorscopusid36189599700
dc.authorscopusid7005308669
dc.authorscopusid25121970100
dc.authorscopusid7007162316
dc.contributor.authorErden, Ismail
dc.contributor.authorErden, Emine Çakcak
dc.contributor.authorDiezhan, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorKarabulut, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorOrdu, Serkan
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:42:54Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:42:54Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractData related to the incidence and clinical outcome of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients with preexisting coronary artery ectasia (CAE) are limited. We assessed whether infarct-related artery ectasia (EIRA) indicates an untoward clinical outcome in patients with AMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). Consecutive patients (n = 643) who presented with AMI and were treated with pPCI were analyzed retrospectively; 31 patients (4.8%) had EIRA. Patients who had EIRA were significantly younger and had higher incidence of hypertension, previous stroke, smoking, inferior wall AMI, and Killip score >1. Infarct-related artery ectasia was more frequent in the right coronary artery (RCA). Impaired epicardial arterial flow, thrombus burden score of infarct-related artery (IRA), impaired Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Myocardial Perfusion Grade, and distal embolization were significantly higher whereas ST-segment resolution and collateral vascular development were significantly lower in patients with EIRA. Infarct-related artery ectasia was an independent predictor of adverse outcome (odds ratio: 0.197; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.062-0.633; P =.006). © 2010 The Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0003319709361197
dc.identifier.endpage579en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-3197
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20395236en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955017118en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage574en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0003319709361197
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12343
dc.identifier.volume61en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAngiologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectadverse outcomeen_US
dc.subjectcoronary artery ectasiaen_US
dc.subjectprimary percutaneous coronary interventionen_US
dc.titleOutcome of primary percutaneous intervention in patients with infarct-related coronary artery ectasiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar