Maksimum ve kalıcı yer değiştirme talepleri açısından TBDY 2018 ve DBYBHY 2007 deprem yönetmeliklerinin karşılaştırılması

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-3526-0764en_US
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Ahmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-06T13:09:48Z
dc.date.available2024-05-06T13:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractSeismic codes are updated by taking into account the information obtained as a result of scientific studies and the observations after earthquakes about the behavior of the building. In Turkey, the Turkish Building Earthquake Codes (TBEC) has also been published in 2019, instead of the Turkish Earthquake Codes (TEC). Both seismic codes contain definitions for nonlinear dynamic analysis for the design and/or evaluation of structures. However, in TBEC, both the definition of the design spectrum and the spectral parameters used to obtain the design spectrum for any location in Turkey have changed. In order to evaluate the effects of these changes on the drift demands, nonlinear dynamic analyzes of single degree of freedom (SDOF) systems with different periods and lateral strength ratios were made according to both TBEC and TEC. Then, mean of the maximum and residual drift demands and the scattering of these demands were compared. For this purpose, totally 72 different TSD systems were considered. For the analysis of these systems, 84 and 168 ground motion record sets were used according to TEC and TBEC (different earthquake zones, soil classes and cities), respectively. When the results are examined; it is seen that a) the design spectrums change according to the soil classes and cities, b) the maximum and residual drift demands change depending on the earthquake levels and soil classes, c) in some cities, the demands obtained with TBEC, and in some cities, the demands obtained with TBEC are higher, d) drift demands scattering within the set is high.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDemir, A. (2023). Maksimum ve kalıcı yer değiştirme talepleri açısından TBDY 2018 ve DBYBHY 2007 deprem yönetmeliklerinin karşılaştırılması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 29(5), 493-506.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5505/pajes.2022.11268
dc.identifier.endpage506en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-7009
dc.identifier.issn2147-5881
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.startpage493en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2022.11268
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12121
dc.identifier.volume29en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001086174200008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.institutionauthorDemir, Ahmet
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherPamukkale Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectGround-Motionen_US
dc.subjectRC Buildingsen_US
dc.subjectRecordsen_US
dc.titleMaksimum ve kalıcı yer değiştirme talepleri açısından TBDY 2018 ve DBYBHY 2007 deprem yönetmeliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıen_US
dc.title.alternativeComparisons of TBEC 2018 and TEC 2007 seismic codes by means of maximum and residual displacement demandsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ahmet-demir.pdf
Boyut:
1.65 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin/Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü Koleksiyonu