Comparison of the magnetic resonance imaging and knee arthroscopy findings of the menisci and ligamentous injuries

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusid6507518960
dc.authorscopusid7003323944
dc.authorscopusid15055297300
dc.authorscopusid7005864946
dc.authorscopusid14324685100
dc.contributor.authorÖzturan, Kutay Engin
dc.contributor.authorYücel, Istemi
dc.contributor.authorÇakici, Hüsamettin
dc.contributor.authorGüven, Melih
dc.contributor.authorGürel, Kamil
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:45:19Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:45:19Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Magnetic resonance imaging is frequently used in the diagnosis of the meniscal and ligamentous injuries. The aim of this study is to compare the results of the knee arthroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging findings retrospectively. Methods: Of the sixty-two patients 37 (59.7%) were male and 25 (40.3%) were female. The average age was 36.8 years (range 18-69 years). Patients who had been clinically diagnosed with meniscal and/or ligamentous injuries and subsequently undergone further magnetic resonance imaging examination were included to the study. The left knee was involved in 35 (56.5%) and the right knee in 27 (43.5%) cases. Patients had gone to knee arthroscopy according to clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging findings, and the results were evaluated. Results: 35 (56.4%) of the 62 patients had isolated medial meniscal tear, 11 (17.7%) isolated lateral meniscal tear and 5 (8%) had isolated complete anterior cruciate ligament injury. 2 (3.2%) had medial meniscal tear and anterior cruciate ligament complete injury, 2 (3.2%) had lateral meniscal tear and complete anterior cruciate ligament injury and 5 (8%) had medial and lateral meniscal tear. 2 (3.2%) had medial meniscal tear, anterior and posterior cruciate ligament complete injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the medial meniscus, lateral meniscus, anterior cruciate ligament and posterior cruciate ligament revealed sensitivity 95.5%, 72.2%, 90.9%, 100%, specificity 76.4%, 93.1%, 88.2%, 98.3%, positive predictive value 91.4%, 81.2%, 62.5%, 66.6%, negative predictive value 86.6%, 89.1%, 97.8%, 100%, and accuracy 90.3%, 87.0%, 88.7%, 98.3% respectively. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging is a safe and appropriate evaluation in the diagnosis of the meniscal and ligament injuries of the knee. © 2012 Düzce Medical Journal.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage4en_US
dc.identifier.issn1307-671X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84869108222en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12969
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherDuzce University Medical Schoolen_US
dc.relation.ispartofDuzce Medical Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectArthroscopyen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectMeniscusen_US
dc.titleComparison of the magnetic resonance imaging and knee arthroscopy findings of the menisci and ligamentous injuriesen_US
dc.title.alternativeMenisküs ve ba? yaralanmalarının manyetik rezonans görüntüleme ve artroskopik cerrahi bulgularının karşılaştırılması]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu