Assessment of the effect of different imaging techniques on planning implant therapy by different clinicians

dc.contributor.authorBulut, Duygu Göller
dc.contributor.authorUstaoğlu, Gülbahar
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-23T18:24:55Z
dc.date.available2021-06-23T18:24:55Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentBAİBÜ, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Ana Bilim Dalıen_US
dc.description.abstractAim: To compare the implant size which was determined by different observers using panoramic radiography (PAN) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with inserted implant size. Material and Methods: 194 PAN and CBCT images which belong to 194 patients who were planned to undergone single-tooth implant therapy were evaluated. 50 anterior regions, 42 premolar regions and 92 molar regions were assessed. These sites were used for planning of dental implant insertion. Images were analyzed by observers with different education and clinic experience backgrounds: one periodontist (observer 1), one oral and maxillofacial radiologist (observer 2), and one general practitioner (observer 3). Panoramic images and cross-sectional CBCT images of each patient were examined; differences in length and width of the implant-to-be from the two imaging systems were analyzed and compared to inserted implant size. Results: Observer 2 recorded the largest implant width whereas observer 3 recorded narrower implants in PAN. Observer 3 recorded shortest implants than did the other two observers in CBCT and observer 2 recorded narrower implants in CBCT. The CBCT measurements allowed a wider implant in the premolar and molar regions. No significant difference was observed between CBCT and PAN in planning the implant length. The inserted implant size was smaller than the measurements made in CBCT. Conclusion: The results show that; different observers present different values in determining implant length and width. The inserted implant size and the dimensions measured on CBCT and PAN images were different.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.714
dc.identifier.endpage537en_US
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issn2636-7688
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage533en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid364557en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.11.714
dc.identifier.urihttps://app.trdizin.gov.tr/makale/TXpZME5UVTNOdz09
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/1028
dc.identifier.volume27en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.institutionauthorBulut, Duygu Göller
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of Medical Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subject[No Keywords]en_US
dc.titleAssessment of the effect of different imaging techniques on planning implant therapy by different cliniciansen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar