Is the "Gök Atlas" sufficiently reliable for forensic age determination of Turkish children?

dc.authorscopusid22833894000
dc.authorscopusid6602245512
dc.authorscopusid6603577026
dc.authorscopusid7005398021
dc.authorscopusid8523160000
dc.authorscopusid6507272091
dc.contributor.authorBüken, Bora
dc.contributor.authorBüken, Erhan
dc.contributor.authorŞafak, Alp Alper
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Burhan
dc.contributor.authorErkol, Zerrin
dc.contributor.authorMayda, Atilla Senih
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:43:16Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:43:16Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAim: We investigated whether the contemporary use of the Gök Atlas method is sufficiently reliable for forensic age estimations of Turkish children. Materials and Methods: Plain radiographs of 248 females and 298 males between 11 and 22 years of age were taken. Paired sample t-tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and linear regression were used to determine the differences and model the relationships between mean skeletal (bone) age (BA) and mean chronological age (CA), using SPSS 11.5 statistical software. Results: In all cases, the CA and BA scores were significantly different and showed high correlation (P < 0.05). The regression model was significant (P < 0.01). According to age groups, the BA was greater than the CA for all age groups by 0.09-3.10 years for boys and 0.44-3.05 years for girls, and this difference was significant for all age groups >14 years for boys and for those 11-18 years of age for girls. The standard deviation of the difference between BA and CA for boys between 11 and 18 years of age and for girls between 11 and 20 years of age was >1 year. Conclusions: We found a large discrepancy between CA and BA according to the Gök Atlas. This discrepancy may be significantly misleading, especially in criminal liability cases. © TÜBİTAK.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage327en_US
dc.identifier.issn1300-0144
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-48849116250en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage319en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12501
dc.identifier.volume38en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectAge estimationen_US
dc.subjectBone ageen_US
dc.subjectGök atlas methoden_US
dc.subjectSkeletal maturationen_US
dc.subjectTurkish childrenen_US
dc.titleIs the "Gök Atlas" sufficiently reliable for forensic age determination of Turkish children?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar