The Relationship Between Executive Functions and Impulsive Buying: A Structural Equation Model

dc.authorscopusid57898162000
dc.authorscopusid7801447094
dc.contributor.authorArıcan, Hasibe
dc.contributor.authorKafadar, Hatice
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T19:45:15Z
dc.date.available2024-09-25T19:45:15Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentAbant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: Planning, set-shifting, and inhibition are processes that come into play in people’s decision-making behavior in their daily lives and are components of executive functions. Methods: We investigated whether individual differences in these cognitive abilities could explain impulsive buying using a comprehensive and verified battery of objective performance measures of executive functions. This research also looks into the role of gender in moderation. The following tests were adminis-tered respectively: Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to measure participants’ set-shifting and problem-solving skills, Stroop Test TBAG Form to measure inhibition, Tower of London Test to measure planning and inhibi-tion. Besides, Impulse Buying Scale was implemented to measure the impulsive buying. The dataset was analyzed through the structural equation model with bootstrap technique by using AMOS 23.0 program. Results: According to results of SEM, planning (? =.37; P =.00, 95% CI [.074,.655]) was significant in directly to predict impulsive buying tendency; however, importance of set-shifting and inhibition were not signifi-cant. According to analysis results, the model was indicated goodness of fit [X2 (22, n = 67) = 24.477, P =.32; x2/df = 1.11; RMSEA =.04; GFI =.92; AGFI =.84; CFI =.99; NFI =.91]. Conclusion: This study is one of few studies examining the relationship between executive functions and impulsive buying, which partially overlaps with the relevant findings in the literature and provides them with new perspectives. In the light of the results obtained, the impulsive buying appearing suddenly without planning in the shopping environment is higher in individuals who have low problem-solving skills, fail in spending planning, and cannot resist the distractors caused by the environment. © Author(s).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/NeuropsychiatricInvest.2022.22006
dc.identifier.endpage63en_US
dc.identifier.issn2792-0070
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85138403304en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage52en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid1166343en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/NeuropsychiatricInvest.2022.22006
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/1166343
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12491/12919
dc.identifier.volume60en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIstanbul Universitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofNeuropsychiatric Investigationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzYK_20240925en_US
dc.subjectexecutive functioning measuresen_US
dc.subjectimpulsive buyingen_US
dc.subjectImpulsivityen_US
dc.subjectplanningen_US
dc.subjectresponse inhibi-tionen_US
dc.subjectself-controlen_US
dc.subjectset shiftingen_US
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Executive Functions and Impulsive Buying: A Structural Equation Modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar