Konuralp merkezinde oturanlarda yaralanmaların sıklığı
Küçük Resim Yok
Tarih
2004
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Amaç : Yaralanmalar dünyada yüksek morbidite, mortalite, sakatlık ve işgücü kayıplarına neden olduğu için halk sağlığı sorunu olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada Konuralp Sağlık Ocağı Bölgesi Merkezi’nde oturanlarda yaralanmaların boyutunun belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve yöntem: Konuralp kasabası merkezinde oturan 4346 kişi bu kesitsel araştırmanın evrenini oluşturdu. Örneklem büyüklüğü Epi Info 2002 programında hesaplandı. Ortalama hane büyüklüğü 4 kabul edilerek; ulaşılması gereken hane sayısı belirlendi. Haneler Ev Halkı Tesbit Fişlerinden sistematik örnekleme yöntemi ile çekilerek belirlendi. Çalışmanın ön denemesi Konuralp merkezindeki beş hanede yapıldıktan sonra araştırma grubuna yaralanmalarla ilgili bir anket formu uygulandı.. Bulgular : 15 Nisan – 5 Mayıs 2003 tarihleri arasında Konuralp Merkez mahallelerindeki 75 hanede oturan 301 kişiden veri toplanarak araştırma yapıldı. Araştırma grubunda ortalama hane halkı büyüklüğü 4,01 kişi idi. Araştırma grubunda yaralanma sıklığı %20.9 olarak bulundu (n=301 kişi). Yaralanan 63 kişiden % 63.5’u son bir yıl içinde, % 22.’si son 15 günde ve % 36.5’ü son 1 ayda yaralamıştır. Yaralanan 63 kişinin yaralanma nedenleri %44.4 düşme, %19.0 yanık , % 14.3 kesiktir. Yaralanmaların %42.9’u evde , % 15.9’u yolda , % 15.9’u bağ – bahçede, % 12.7’si okulda, %9.5’u işyerinde meydana gelmiştir (n=63). Yaralananların %31.7’si hastaneye veya herhangi bir sağlık kuruluşuna baş vurmuştur. İstatistiksel olarak anlamlı olarak tespit edilmemiş olmasına rağmen öğrenim düzeyi düştükçe yaralanma sıklığının arttığı gözlenmiştir. Sonuç : Yaralananların üçte birinden azının herhangi bir sağlık kuruluşuna başvurması yaralanmaların gerçek sıklığının ancak saha araştırmaları ile ortaya konabileceğini göstermektedir.
Objectives: Injury is accepted a Public Health problem because it results high mortality, morbidity, disability and loss of labour force all over the world. There aren’t many studies done about injuries in our country. In this study prevalence of injury was aimed to determine in people living at central district of Konuralp. Materials and method: The study was done on 4346 townspeople living at the central district of Konuralp. Sample size was calculated at Epi Info 2002 statistical programme. Mean family size was accepted as 4 and the number of houses to be reached determined. The houses determined by systematic sampling from the cards of houses at Konuralp Primary Care Health Center. After testing the questionnaires at 5 houses at Konuralp, questionnaires were implemented to the study group. Results: Data collected from 301 people living at 75 houses from April 15 to May 5, 2003. Mean family size was 4.01. Injury prevalence found 20.9% (n=301 people). Of 63 injured people 63.5% injured in last year, 22.2% in last 15 days and 36.5% in last month. Injury causes of 63 people were; fall down 44.4%, burns %19.0, cuts % 14.3. Of injuries, %42.9 happened at home, % 15.9 on the road, % 15.9 in the garden, % 12.7 in the school, %9.5 at work (n=63 people). Of injured, 31.7% applied to the hospital or any health center. It could not be shown statistically significant but it was observed that the frequency of injuries increased in people who have less education years Conclusion: Current study reveals that field studies can determine the real prevalence of injuries because it was found in this study that less than 1 third of injured people applied to health centers.
Objectives: Injury is accepted a Public Health problem because it results high mortality, morbidity, disability and loss of labour force all over the world. There aren’t many studies done about injuries in our country. In this study prevalence of injury was aimed to determine in people living at central district of Konuralp. Materials and method: The study was done on 4346 townspeople living at the central district of Konuralp. Sample size was calculated at Epi Info 2002 statistical programme. Mean family size was accepted as 4 and the number of houses to be reached determined. The houses determined by systematic sampling from the cards of houses at Konuralp Primary Care Health Center. After testing the questionnaires at 5 houses at Konuralp, questionnaires were implemented to the study group. Results: Data collected from 301 people living at 75 houses from April 15 to May 5, 2003. Mean family size was 4.01. Injury prevalence found 20.9% (n=301 people). Of 63 injured people 63.5% injured in last year, 22.2% in last 15 days and 36.5% in last month. Injury causes of 63 people were; fall down 44.4%, burns %19.0, cuts % 14.3. Of injuries, %42.9 happened at home, % 15.9 on the road, % 15.9 in the garden, % 12.7 in the school, %9.5 at work (n=63 people). Of injured, 31.7% applied to the hospital or any health center. It could not be shown statistically significant but it was observed that the frequency of injuries increased in people who have less education years Conclusion: Current study reveals that field studies can determine the real prevalence of injuries because it was found in this study that less than 1 third of injured people applied to health centers.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Birinci Basamak Sağlık Hizmetleri, Yaralar ve Yaralanmalar, Yaygınlık, Primary Health Care, Wounds and Injuries, Prevalence
Kaynak
Sağlık ve Toplum
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
14
Sayı
4
